Research Article |
Corresponding author: James M. H. Tweed ( j.tweed@uq.edu.au ) Academic editor: Klaus-Gerhard Heller
© 2023 James M. H. Tweed, Michael Wakelin, Bruce McKinlay, Tara J. Murray.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Tweed JMH, Wakelin M, McKinlay B, Murray TJ (2023) Notes on the distribution, ecology, and life history of Maotoweta virescens (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae, Macropathinae) and a comparison of two survey methods. Journal of Orthoptera Research 32(1): 43-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.32.86076
|
When described in 2014, Maotoweta virescens was believed to be one of New Zealand’s rarest cave wētā (Rhaphidophoridae). Here, we present new information about the distribution, ecology, and life history of the species. M. virescens has now been recorded from indigenous forest sites throughout the length of the western South Island, where it can occur in relatively high abundance. M. virescens shows a close association with arboreal mosses, particularly Weymouthia mollis, roosting within them during the day and feeding on them at night. The wētā has also been documented feeding on lichens and dead insects. The species is hypothesized to have a lifecycle of approximately one year, closely linked to season. Eggs are thought to hatch out relatively quickly after being laid in summer and early autumn, with the species overwintering as nymphs and maturing the following late spring through to early-autumn. Further work is required to fully understand its biology. A comparison was made between active night searching and vegetation beating as two different methods for the detection and monitoring of M. virescens. Beating of W. mollis and other suitable M. virescens microhabitats was found to be significantly more effective than night searching. Our results show that M. virescens is widespread and can occur at relatively high densities within South Island temperate forests, with the species’ perceived rarity to date largely owing to a lack of survey effort and the past use of ineffective sampling methods.
beating, cave wētā, data deficient, New Zealand, moss
Orthopteroid insects belonging to the family Rhaphidophoridae are found throughout most temperate regions of the world (
Within New Zealand (NZ), rhaphidophorids are commonly known as cave wētā. The name ‘wētā’ is also used for New Zealand Orthoptera in the family Anostostomatidae, including the tree wētā (Hemideina spp.) and giant wētā (Deinacrida spp.), which are often viewed as national icons. However, the more secretive cave wētā are relatively poorly known. The NZ cave wētā fauna is diverse relative to the country’s land area. The 71 known species (
None of NZ’s cave wētā have yet been assessed for the IUCN Red List (
Despite its distinctive green coloration, which distinguishes it from almost all other NZ cave wētā species, Maotoweta virescens Johns & Cook, 2014 escaped scientific attention until recently. At the time of its description, M. virescens, commonly called the moss wētā, was believed to be one of the rarest species of cave wētā in New Zealand as it was known from only seven specimens (
To improve our knowledge of rare or poorly known species such as M. virescens, survey methods must be designed to maximize the chance of reliably detecting the target species when it is present (
The objectives of the current study were as follows: (1) to improve our understanding of the distribution, ecology, and life history of M. virescens, (2) to identify the most suitable means of detecting and/or monitoring M. virescens, and (3) to recommend an appropriate threat classification for M. virescens to help determine whether conservation action is required for its protection. The findings from this study may have relevance to other species of forest-dwelling Rhaphidophoridae.
Field surveys.—Surveys for M. virescens were undertaken at 20 South Island sites from January–June 2021 (Table
Locations surveyed for Maotoweta virescens during this study arranged from north to south. Site name area codes follow
Site name | Habitat | Average annual rainfall (mm) | Survey date(s) | Latitude (°), Longitude (°) | Survey type | M. virescens detected | No. specimens collected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Karangarua Valley, WD | Mixed temperate forest | 8,374 | 08/06/21 | -43.707, 169.867 | P/A (day + night) | Yes | 2 |
Martins Bay, WD | Mixed temperate forest | 5,644 | 22–23/02/21, 26/02/21 | -44.342, 168.009 | P/A (day + night) | Yes | 6 |
Hokuri Creek, WD | Mixed temperate forest | 6,211 | 25/02/21 | -44.409, 168.059 | TBS (225 mins) | Yes | 17 |
George Sound, FD | Mixed temperate forest | 7,884 | 03/02/21 | -44.985, 167.438 | P/A (day + night) | Yes | 2 |
Henry Pass, FD | Alpine grassland, subalpine shrubland | 8,383 | 01–02/02/21 | -45.010, 167.498 | P/A (day only) | No | NA |
Caswell Sound, FD | Mixed temperate forest | 7,386 | 04/02/21 | -45.047, 167.307 | TNS (100 mins), TBS (70 mins) | Yes | 8 |
Lake Marchant, FD | Mixed temperate forest | 7,386 | 05/02/21 | -45.056, 167.317 | P/A (day only) | Yes | 1 |
Junction Burn, FD | Mixed temperate forest | 6,306 | 09–11/02/21 | -45.151, 167.498 | P/A (day + night) | Yes | 4 |
Lake Mistletoe, OL | Open beech forest | 1,311 | 12/02/21 | -45.201, 167.824 | No | NA | |
Hanging Valley Track, Doubtful Sound, FD | Mixed temperate forest | 7,782 | 01/03/21 | -45.471, 167.143 | TNS (180 mins), TBS (95 mins) | Yes | 12 |
Old Doubtful Track, Doubtful Sound, FD | Mixed temperate forest | 7,782 | 02/03/21 | -45.479, 167.171 | TBS (90 mins) | Yes | 4 |
Wilmot Pass, FD | Mixed temperate forest and subalpine scrub | 7,009 | 04/03/21 | -45.512, 167.197 | P/A (day only) | Yes | 1 |
Princhester Creek, Takitimu Mountains, SL | Open beech forest | 1,096 | 06/03/21 | -45.600, 167.956 | TBS (105 mins) | Yes | 1 |
Grebe Valley, FD | Mixed temperate forest | 4,019 | 26/01/21 | -45.659, 167.344 | P/A (day only) | Yes | 1 |
Borland Saddle, FD | Open beech forest, alpine grassland | 2,278 | 25/01/21 | -45.747, 167.382 | P/A (day only) | No | NA |
Borland Lodge, FD | Open beech forest | 1,318 | 24/01/21 | -45.780, 167.533 | P/A (day + night) | No | NA |
Rakeahua Valley, SI | Mixed temperate forest | 1,751 | 08–11/03/21 | -46.982, 167.881 | P/A (day + night) | No | NA |
Ulva Island, SI | Mixed temperate forest | 1,401 | 13/03/21 | -46.892, 168.099 | P/A (day only) | No | NA |
Fern Gully, SI | Mixed temperate forest | 1,387 | 14/03/21 | -46.929, 168.130 | P/A (day only) | No | NA |
McLean Falls, SL | Mixed temperate forest | 1,339 | 15/03/21 | -46.572, 169.347 | TBS (20 mins) | Yes | 2 |
Surveys were conducted in a range of habitat types, including mixed temperate forest, open beech forest, subalpine shrubland, and alpine grasslands. However, most surveys were conducted within mixed temperate forest or open beech forest. These are the characteristic forest types of the higher and lower rainfall regions of NZ’s South Island, respectively (Table
In the South Island, the canopy of mixed temperate forest comprises a variable mixture of tree species including several species of Podocarpaceae (podocarps), Nothofagaceae (southern beeches), and Myrtaceae (myrtles), among others (
Forest types surveyed during this study. A. Typical mixed temperate forest photographed at Hokuri Creek in the lower Hollyford Valley, FD (note the extensive covering of Weymouthia mollis and other mosses and liverworts on the trunks and limbs of most trees and shrubs, as well as the forest floor); B. Typical open beech forest photographed within the Takitimu Mountains, SL (photo credit: N Harbison-Price).
The beech forest habitats surveyed were dominated by one or more of the southern beeches, with a relatively open, low-diversity understory comprised largely of divaricating shrubs (Fig.
Surveys for M. virescens were undertaken by a) visual spotlight searches at night, and b) beating of understory vegetation during the day. Notes were recorded on the habitat in which each wētā was detected, including the plants on which they were observed, the structure of the surrounding forest, and the elevation. Some wētā encountered at each location were collected for morphological analysis.
Comparison of survey methodologies.—In addition to the presence-absence surveys noted above, timed night searches and daytime beating searches were undertaken at a subset of sites.
Night searches. Timed night searches were undertaken at two Fiordland locations: Caswell Sound and Doubtful Sound (Table
Beating. We used daytime beating as the primary method for detecting M. virescens during this study. Preliminary work indicated that M. virescens might roost within mosses during the day, so we opted to use daytime beating as a sampling method. The traditional beating method for sampling invertebrates from vegetation uses a flat or slightly convex beating tray. Here, beating for M. virescens was undertaken using an entomological net (38 cm diameter) instead of a flat tray, as it ensured wētā were not able to jump away before being recorded. Wētā specimens were primarily collected off the inside walls of the net, although some smaller nymphs were found among the debris in the bottom of the net.
Timed beating surveys were conducted following the same methodology as timed night surveys and were conducted at six locations (Table
Statistical analysis.—A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the mean search time per M. virescens specimen observed for night searching and beating surveys. Analysis was conducted using the wilcox.test() function of the statistical software R (
Additional distribution records.—The curators of NZ’s largest entomological collections were contacted to determine whether they held any M. virescens specimens: New Zealand Arthropod Collection (NZAC), Auckland Museum (
Distribution and environmental variables.—All available records of M. virescens were plotted using QGIS v3.16.0. The elevation of each record was assessed using NZTopo50 map series. Values for the annual rainfall at the detection locations were extracted from the Ministry for the Environment’s annual average rainfall data (
Observations of captive wētā.—A total of five adult female and two adult male M. virescens were kept in captivity for up to one month to observe their behavior and diet. The incidentally biased sex ratio among captive specimens available meant that up to four females were kept together with a single male. Wētā were kept in a plastic tank lined with paper towel. The tank was misted once per day to keep it moist. Twigs were placed in the tank for the wētā to climb and roost on. Mosses (Weymouthia mollis (Hedw.) Broth., Orthotrichaceae sp.), lichens (Cladonia ?confusa R. Sant., ?Lobaria sp., Pseudocyphellaria sp., Yarrumia ?colensoi (C.Bab.) D.J.Galloway), liverworts (?Trichocolea ?mollissima (Hook.f. & Taylor) Gottsche, ?Lepicolea sp.), and the leaves of some vascular plants (Coprosma rhamnoides A.Cunn., Metrosideros sp., Fuscospora sp., Weinmannia racemosa (L.f.) Pillon et H.C.Hopkins) were collected from the same localities as the wētā and placed within the tank. Insect carcasses were also offered to the captive wētā in the form of freshly caught hoverflies (Melanostoma fasciatum (Macquart, 1850) (Diptera, Syrphidae), which were swept from rank grass and killed by freezing.
Behavioral observations were made opportunistically both during the day and at night, and given the small sample size available, no attempt was made to undertake a full quantitative analysis of behavior. At night, the wētā were observed using a red light, as this is known to cause less disturbance to cave wētā than white or yellow lights (
Morphological characteristics.—Both nymphs and adults were collected to study the growth and development of M. virescens. A total of 10 adults and 51 nymphs were collected from various locations during the surveys. Specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol and have been deposited within the Phoenix Collection housed at Massey University, Palmerston North, NZ. The length of the hind femur, hind tibiae, body, and ovipositor for the females were measured using digital calipers for all collected specimens. The presence or absence of an ovipositor was used to sex the specimens, which may have led to some early instar female nymphs being falsely identified as males. Due to this uncertainty, no statistical comparison was made between the body sizes of male and female nymphs. Morphology measurements were plotted using the package ggplot2 (
Distribution.—Maotoweta virescens has now been recorded throughout the length of the South Island of NZ, with most records occurring to the west of the Southern Alps (Fig.
Known records of Maotoweta virescens. A. Records overlain on the current extent of indigenous forest; B. Records overlain on mean annual rainfall. Circles represent records of M. virescens obtained during this study, triangles are confirmed records from other sources, and crosses indicate sites surveyed during this survey at which M. virescens was not detected. The extent of indigenous forest was taken from
Habitat.—Maotoweta virescens is now known from a wide elevation range, having been recorded from sea level at Caswell Sound, FD during this study, and at altitudes of up to 1,200 masl at Mt Arthur, NN, in the earlier study of
Records from this study and additional distribution records indicate that M. virescens is primarily associated with mature forest habitats (Fig.
Maotoweta virescens was detected in all mixed temperate forest locations surveyed in Fiordland, Westland, and the Catlins (Table
Maotoweta virescens was also found within open beech forest. A single nymph was beaten from a Coprosma rhamnoides shrub in the forest understory at Princhester Creek in the Takitimu Mountains, SL, the type locality for M. virescens. This shrub had a thin layer of an unidentified species of moss on its stem. Although mats of mosses and liverworts were present on most tree trunks, the open beech forest habitat lacked the curtains of hanging moss characteristic of M. virescens habitat within the mixed temperate forests surveyed. Maotoweta virescens was not detected from open beech forest searched near Borland Lodge, FD, or at Lake Mistletoe, OL; however, the species has been confirmed from Monowai Flats, ~1 km from the site surveyed at Borland Lodge (T Jewell pers. comm.; Fig.
Although no adults of any other cave wētā species were encountered while beating moss for M. virescens, the nymphs of other species were occasionally caught, including Talitropsis chopardi (Karny, 1937) and Notoplectron brewsterense (Richards, 1972). Several species of cave wētā were also routinely encountered on the trunks of trees or on the forest floor during night searches for M virescens, including Miotopus richardsae Fitness, Morgan-Richards, Hegg & Trewick, 2018, Talitropsis sedilloti Bolívar, 1882, and several Isoplectron species.
Morphological characteristics.—Based on body measurements and the development of female genitalia, all specimens collected appeared to be either adults or early-instar nymphs (Fig.
The lengths of the bodies (2.3–5.1 mm), hind femur (2.1–4.2 mm), and hind tibia (2.2–4.5 mm) of the nymphs measured (n = 51) displayed an almost continuous range, with no discrete size classes evident that could be used to separate instars. The two nymphs collected from the Karangarua Valley, WD, had marginally longer hind tibiae and femora than any other early-instar nymphs measured, but their body sizes overlapped with those of the other collected nymphs (Fig.
Among adult specimens (n = 10), the length of the body, hind femur, and hind tibia ranged from 8.6–10.8 mm, 7.2–7.6 mm, and 8.1–9.1 mm, respectively, for males (n = 5), and from 7.8–11.2 mm, 7.0–8.2 mm, and 7.3–9.0 mm for females (n = 5). Ovipositor length ranged from 4.6–5.9 mm.
Color variation.—The coloration of M. virescens was found to be highly variable (Fig.
Photos of adult Maotoweta virescens. A. Female from Milford Sound, FD; B. Female from Lake Gunn, FD; C. Male from Milford Sound, FD; D. Male from Runanga, WD. Photo credit: Tony Jewell (www.flickr.com/photos/rocknvole/).
Hind femur (A), hind tibia (B), and ovipositor (C) length of Maotoweta virescens specimens collected in this study plotted against body length. The observations within the solid oval on each plot are the specimens collected from the Karangarua Valley, WD, in June; those within the dashed oval are adult specimens collected during this study; those not circled are other early-instar nymphs collected during this study.
Examples of phenotypic variation displayed by Maotoweta virescens. A. Male, Martins Bay, WD; B. Female, Martins Bay, WD; C. Female, Doubtful Sound, FD; D. Female, Wilmot Pass, FD; E. Male, Martins Bay, WD; F. Female, Martins Bay, WD; G. Male, Hokuri Creek, WD; H. Penultimate instar female, Doubtful Sound, FD. Note: images are not to scale. Body length of all individuals was between 7.8 mm (H) and 11.2 mm (B).
Behavioral observations.—In captivity, M. virescens was found to be entirely nocturnal. During the day, the wētā would roost on twigs, camouflaged among clumps of moss. When at rest, the wētā would fold their antenna beneath their body and then fold them again, approximately beneath the mesocoxa, so that the tips lay flat along the branch on which they were sitting (i.e., they were folded into a collapsed S-shape when viewed laterally; Fig.
At night, captive M. virescens would roam around their enclosure, climbing along twigs as well as the walls and ceiling of the enclosure. Roaming wētā waved their antenna in front of them constantly, stopping only when they encountered a food source. When two individuals met each other, they would pause briefly, inspect each other with their antenna, and then move around one another, continuing their path. No aggression was observed between individuals. Captive individuals that died overnight were removed the following day. No feeding damage was observed on any of the dead wētā.
No mating was observed in captivity or in the field, but males and females were found in proximity on numerous occasions. Oviposition was also not observed but the swollen abdomen of a female caught at Martins Bay (26 February 2021) suggested at least some females were gravid at the time the surveys were conducted.
A single captive wētā was observed undergoing ecdysis from the penultimate instar to an adult on the 04 March 2021. The female (depicted pre-molt in Fig.
Diet.—Maotoweta virescens were observed feeding on the moss Weymouthia mollis in the field during night searches. Weymouthia mollis was actively fed on by captive M. virescens but appeared to lose its palatability as it dried out. Some feeding was observed on a second moss offered (Orthotrichaceae sp.) but not for sustained periods, suggesting it was not a preferred food source.
Captive wētā actively fed on the foliose lichens offered, particularly Yarrumia ?colensoi. The wētā ate holes through the middle of the sheets of Yarrumia but were only observed feeding on the edges of Pseudocyphellaria and ?Lobaria lichens. No feeding was observed on the fruticose Cladonia confusa. No browsing was observed on either the liverworts or the leaves of any of the vascular plants offered.
All insect carcasses offered to the captive wētā were consumed on the first night; however, several captive wētā that died overnight were not fed on by others prior to their removal the following day.
Comparison of survey methodologies.—The mean search time per M. virescens specimen detected using beating was significantly lower than that of active night searching (Wilcoxon’s test, p = 0.038, Fig.
This study has shown that M. virescens is widely distributed throughout NZ’s South Island. Current records suggest that the species is most closely associated with the mixed temperate forests of the western and southern South Island. However, records from the Takitimu Mountains, SL (
Although some species of Rhaphidophoridae are known to be closely associated with plants (e.g., the North American species Gammarotettix bilobatus (Thomas, 1872) (
Mosses, lichens, and dead insects were documented here as part of the diet of M. virescens and are also known to be consumed by other cave wētā species (
Rearing NZ cave wētā species from eggs and/or nymphs to adulthood has been found to be challenging (
Among Orthopteran families such as Tettigoniidae (
An alternative to the above theory is that M. virescens has a short egg development period. This would mean that egg hatching occurs relatively quickly after mating and oviposition in summer/autumn. Nymphs would then overwinter in their early- to mid-instars before reaching maturity the following year in late spring to early autumn. Similar seasonal lifecycles have been documented for other rhaphidophorids including Pachyrhamma edwardsii (Scudder, 1869) from NZ (
The lack of mid-instar nymphs observed during this study may alternatively be explained by an ontogenetic niche shift in M. virescens. For example, M. virescens may move up higher into the forest canopy during the mid-instar phases of its lifecycle.
As has been found for other cave wētā species (e.g.,
When
Within the open beech forest habitat of Princhester Creek in the Takitimu Mountains, beating proved only marginally more effective at detecting M. virescens than night searching. This result may indicate that open beech forest represents sub-optimal habitat for M. virescens, meaning densities are naturally low. It could also reflect the relative lack of hanging mosses within this habitat type, which made beating more difficult. Habitat structure is known to affect the efficacy of some Orthopteran survey methods, including sweeping (
The field work reported here was completed as part of a wider project to investigate the distribution of Data Deficient invertebrates in southern NZ (
Thank you to all the volunteers who assisted with the field surveys during which this research was conducted: Steve Kerr, David Mayo, Liz Sherwood, and Nichaela Harbison-Price. Thank you to Billy and the Deep Cove Outdoor Education Trust for providing accommodation during fieldwork in Doubtful Sound. Thank you also to Tony Jewell, Rod Morris, and Danilo Hegg for providing location data and ecological notes from their encounters with M. virescens. Thanks to all the curators who kindly responded to requests about specimens within their collections: Kane Fleury (