Research Article
Print
Research Article
First record of Myrmecophilus (Myrmecophilus) quadrispinus for Peru and South America (Orthoptera, Myrmecophilidae)
expand article infoNicolás Naveda Yuan, Thomas Stalling§
‡ Unaffiliated, Lima, Peru
§ Unaffiliated, Inzlingen, Germany
Open Access

Abstract

The first record of the ant cricket Myrmecophilus (Myrmecophilus) quadrispinus Perkins, 1899 for Peru and South America is presented. This species was discovered in the city of Lima in the nests of the ant species Brachymyrmex cordemoyi Forel, 1895, and Pheidole sp. Westwood, 1939 under a square brick and a stone in two urban gardens.

Keywords

ants, faunistics, first record, myrmecophiles, neotropics, South America

Introduction

Ant crickets of the genus Myrmecophilus Berthold, 1827 are small orthopterans known to live as guests in ant nests. Their main distinctive morphological features are their minute size, wingless and ovoid body, slightly long antennae, and oversized hind femora. Their specific body color and the number of spurs on the hind leg are diagnostic characteristics along with the male genitalia and female ovipositor’s shape variability (Desutter–Grandcolas 1997, Hebard 1920, Stalling and Birrer 2013, Hsu et al. 2020). Ant crickets are myrmecophiles that live among ants in their nests, probably developing mimicry without inducing aggressive behavior (Hölldobler 1947). Myrmecophilus species can be associated with dozens of ant species (Hölldobler 1947, Masloski and Greenwood 2013). Some Myrmecophilus species are host-specific, whereas other species are host-generalists and use a wide range of host ant species (Komatsu et al. 2009). Living in the ant nests, they enjoy stable environmental conditions, easy access to food, and a place to hide (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990, Iorgu et al. 2021). Past studies have shown that they primarily feed on the secretions resulting from strigilating their legs with their body and participating in trophallaxis with the ants by imitating their grooming behavior (Wheeler 1900, Wetterer and Hugel 2008).

To date, the genus Myrmecophilus includes 63 valid species from three subgenera that have been described worldwide (Hsu et al. 2020, Cigliano et al. 2022). From South America, only Myrmecophilus (Myrmophilina) americanus Saussure, 1877 was reported in Brazil and Colombia (Saussure 1877, Wasmann 1905, Wetterer and Hugel 2008). The genus was also found in Peru by Mónica Narrea Cango (unpublished data), but these findings were never published and the species remained unidentified.

Methods

Ant nests were checked for ant crickets in Lima (Peru) in 2020 and 2021, by the first author. The ant nests were found by turning square bricks and stones from gardens in a 450-m radius around the first author’s house. The specimens were caught, frozen, and then preserved in 96% ethanol. Two specimens were preserved in the collection of the first author, which were identified to the family level using the dichotomous keys in Borror and Delong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects 7th ed. (Triplehorn and Johnson 2005). Myrmecophilus identification was performed using the criteria of Desutter–Grandcolas (1997), Hsu et al. (2020) and by direct comparison with specimens of Myrmecophilus (Myrmecophilus) quadrispinus Perkins, 1899 from France (oversea department Réunion), Japan, and Taiwan and with specimens of Myrmecophilus (Myrmophilina) americanus from Taiwan, Malaysia and Israel, which are deposited in the collection of Thomas Stalling. The ants associated with the Myrmecophilus specimens were also collected. The identification was performed following Bolton (1994) and Ortiz (2012) and with the kind support extended by Claudia M. Ortiz Sepúlveda for the identification of Brachymyrmex cordemoyi Forel, 1895. The Pheidole species has not been further identified. Around one hundred Pheidole species are known from Peru, some of which are difficult to identify. The cockroaches associated with the Brachymyrmex ant species found were identified following Anisyutkin (2018) and Roth (1998).

Results and discussion

Family Myrmecophilidae Saussure, 1874

Subfamily Myrmecophilinae Saussure, 1874

Tribe Myrmecophilini Saussure, 1874

Myrmecophilus (Myrmecophilus) quadrispinus Perkins, 1899

Material examined.

PERU • 1 adult ♀; Lima province, Lima; 12°06'19.2"S, 76°58'13.3"W, 170 m a.s.l.; July 2020; in the nest of Brachymyrmex cordemoyi Forel, 1895, leg. Nicolás Yuan Naveda • 1 adult ♀; Lima province, Lima; 12°6'25.319"S, 76°58'21.238"W, 169 a.s.l., November 2020; in the nest of Pheidole sp., leg. Nicolás Yuan Naveda • 1 adult ♂, Lima province, Lima, 12°6'25.319"S, 76°58'21.238"W, 169 a.s.l., November 2021, leg. Nicolás Yuan Naveda.

A first adult female of M. (M.) quadrispinus was found in July 2020 and a second adult female in November 2020. Both specimens were found and collected from an ant nest under a square brick and a stone, respectively. An adult male specimen was found and collected in November 2021, in an ant nest under a stone. The habitat associated with the gardens was an urban area with several houses, buildings, tracks, sidewalks, and parks (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. 

Habitat of Myrmecophilus (Myrmecophilus) quadrispinus; Peru, Lima, November 2020. Photo: NYN.

The three adult specimens were identified as M. (M.) quadrispinus on the basis of their unique combination of characters: uniform dark brown coloration of the head and body, yellowish cerci (Fig. 2), three dorsal spines positioned in the proximal, medial and distal portions of the metatarsus and outer ovipositor valvae of female (viewed laterally) double pointed (Fig. 3). All other Myrmecophilus species show either a different coloration of the body or cerci, a different shape of the ovipositor, or a different number or position of the spines on the tarsus. The Myrmecophilus species of North America are distinguished by body color (pale ochreous in M. (Myrmecophilus) manni Schimmer, 1911 and M. (Myrmecophilus) nebrascensis Lugger, 1898) and by the color of the cerci (dark brown in M. (Myrmecophilus) pergandei Bruner, 1884 and M. (Myrmecophilus) oregonensis Bruner, 1884), among other characteristics.

Fig. 2. 

Myrmecophilus (Myrmecophilus) quadrispinus, female; Peru, Lima, July 2020. Habitus, showing the typical shape and uniform brown body color of the species. Photo: NYN.

Fig. 3. 

Myrmecophilus (Myrmecophilus) quadrispinus, female; Peru, Lima, July 2020. Details of the hind leg and the ovipositor of a female. Illustration: NYN.

Additionally, the ants found associated with the female specimens were identified as Brachymyrmex cordemoyi Forel, 1895, and Pheidole sp. Westwood, 1939. The first species coexisted with the cockroach Pycnoscelus surinamensis (Linnaeus, 1758). This finding agrees with those of Moretti et al. (2011) indicating that B. cordemoyi may be associated with P. surinamensis and hence exhibiting domiciliation trend. No ants were detected associated with the male specimen, but the site was only three meters from where the second female was found.

Ant cricket nymphs were also found, but they fled away. Both nymphs and adults were mixed in ant colonies. B. cordemoyi and Pheidole sp. host ants are smaller than M. (M.) quadrispinus adults.

The finding of M. (M.) quadrispinus represents the first record for Peru and all South America. M. (M.) quadrispinus was previously known from the tropics and subtropics of southeast Asia and the Indian Ocean (Hsu et al. 2020). The ant crickets are difficult to find because of their cryptic mode of living in the ant nests. Therefore, we can assume that M. (M.) quadrispinus or other Myrmecophilus species can be found in other regions of Peru and South America in the future.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Amir Weinstein (Tel Aviv, Israel), Samuel Danflous (Toulouse, France), Takashi Komatsu (Fukuoka, Japan), Munetoshi Maruyama (Fukuoka, Japan), and Po-Wei Hsu (Kyoto, Japan) for providing Myrmecophilus specimens for comparison, to Claudia M. Ortiz Sepúlveda (Lille, France) for her help in identifying the Brachymyrmex species and to Lucas Denadai de Campos (São Paulo, Brazil) and Pedro Guilherme Barrios de Souza Dias (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for reviewing the manuscript. Lastly, we want to thank the Journal of Orthoptera Research for their support in publishing this article.

References

  • Anisyutkin L (2018) New data on the genus Pycnoscelus Scudder, 1862 with the description of P. schwendingeri sp. nov. (Blaberidae: Pycnoscelinae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 125: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1196021
  • Bolton B (1994) Identification Guide to the Ant Genera of the World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 222 pp.
  • Forel A (1895) Nouvelles fourmis de diverses provenances, surtout d’Australie. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 39: 41–49.
  • Hebard M (1920) Revision of the North American Species of the Genus Myrmecophila (Orthoptera; Gryllidae; Myrmecophilinae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 46: 91–111.
  • Hölldobler K (1947) Studien über die Ameisengrille (Myrmecophilus acervorum Panzer) im mittleren Maingebiet. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 20: 607–648.
  • Hsu P-W, Hugel S, Wetterer JK, Tseng S-P, Ooi C-SM, Lee C-Y, Yang C-CS (2020) Ant crickets (Orthoptera: Myrmecophilidae) associated with the invasive yellow crazy ant Anoplolepis gracilipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): evidence for cryptic species and potential co-introduction with hosts. Myrmecological News 30: 103–129. https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_030:103
  • Iorgu IŞ, Iorgu EI, Stalling T, Puskás G, Chobanov D, Szövényi G, Moscaliuc LA, Motoc R, Tăuşan I, Fusu L (2021) Ant crickets and their secrets: Myrmecophilus acervorum is not always parthenogenetic (Insecta: Orthoptera: Myrmecophilidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society XX: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab084
  • Komatsu T, Maruyama M, Itino T (2009) Behavioral differences between two ant cricket species in Nansei Islands: host-specialist versus host-generalist. Insectes Sociaux 56: 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-009-0036-y
  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturae 1, ed. 10, Holmiae. Salvius, Stockholm, 823 pp.
  • Lugger O (1898) The Orthoptera of Minnesota. McGill-Warner Company, St. Paul, 296 pp.
  • Masloski KE, Greenwood C (2013) First Record of Myrmecophilus nebrascensis Lugger 1898 (Orthoptera: Myrmecophilidae) in Beaver County, Oklahoma. Journal of Orthoptera Research 22: 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1665/034.022.0101
  • Moretti TdC, Quirán EM, Solis DR, Rossi ML, Thyssen PJ (2011) Pycnoscelus surinamensis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Blaberoidea: Blaberidae), a cockroach with a possible association with the ant Brachymyrmex cordemoyi Forel, 1895 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and which may be exhibiting a domiciliation trend. Symbiosis 53: 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-010-0101-3
  • Ortiz CM (2012) Revisión taxonómica de las hormigas del género Brachymyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae) (Tesis de Maestría). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
  • Perkins RCL (1899) Fauna Hawaiiensis, Vol. II, Part I, Orthoptera. Cambridge, University Press, 30 pp.
  • Roth LM (1998) The cockroach genus Pycnoscelus Scudder, with a description of Pycnoscelus femapterus, sp. nov. (Blattaria: Blaberidae: Pycnoscelinae). Oriental Insects 32: 93–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.1998.10433770
  • De Saussure H (1877) Mélanges Orthoptérologiques, Vme Fascicule. Mémoires de la Societé de Physique et d’Histoire Naturelle de Genève 25: 1–504.
  • Stalling T, Birrer S (2013) Identification of the ant-loving crickets, Myrmecophilus Berthold, 1827 (Orthoptera: Myrmecophilidae), in Central Europe and the northern Mediterranean Basin. Articulata 28: 1–11.
  • Triplehorn CA, Johnson N (2004) Borror and DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects (7th ed.). Brooks/Cole, 864 pp.
  • Wasmann E (1905) Zur Lebensweise einiger in- und ausländischer Ameisengäste (148. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Myrmecophilen und Termitophilen). Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Insektenbiologie 10: 329–336.
  • Wetterer JK, Hugel S (2008) Worldwide Spread of the Ant Cricket Myrmecophilus americanus, a symbiont of the Longhorn Crazy Ant, Paratrechina longicornis. Sociobiology 52: 157–165.
login to comment