Research Article |
Corresponding author: Charly Oumarou Ngoute ( coumaroungoute@yahoo.fr ) Academic editor: Daniel Petit
© 2021 Charly Oumarou Ngoute, David Hunter, Michel Lecoq.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ngoute CO, Hunter D, Lecoq M (2021) Perception and knowledge of grasshoppers among indigenous communities in tropical forest areas of southern Cameroon: Ecosystem conservation, food security, and health. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 117-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.64266
|
The increased attention given to health, food security, and biodiversity conservation in recent years should bring together conventional scientists and indigenous people to share their knowledge systems for better results. This work aims to assess how grasshoppers are perceived by the local people in southern Cameroon, particularly in terms of food, health, and landscape conservation. Villagers were interviewed individually using a rapid rural assessment method in the form of a semi-structured survey. Nearly all people (99%) declared that they are able to identify local grasshoppers, generally through the color of the insect (80%). Crop fields were the most often cited landscape (16%) in terms of abundance of grasshoppers, with forest being less mentioned (8%). In general, villagers claimed that grasshopper abundance increased with forest degradation. Grasshoppers were found during all seasons of the year but noted to be more abundant during the long dry seasons. People found grasshoppers both useful and harmful, the most harmful reported being Zonocerus variegatus, an important crop pest. Cassava is the most attacked crop with 75–100% losses. Industrial crops, such as cocoa, coffee, and bananas, were not cited as being damaged by grasshoppers. The most effective conventional method cited for the control of pest grasshoppers is the use of pesticides (53%) with, in most cases (27%), a 75–100% efficiency. The traditional method of spreading ash was also often cited (19%), with an estimated efficiency of 25–75%. Biological methods were neither cited nor used by the villagers. Most of them (87%) declared that they eat grasshoppers; some sold these insects in the market (58%) and some used them to treat diseases (11%).
biodiversity conservation, Caelifera, crop pest, disease, indigenous people, Orthoptera
Sustainable development is now emerging as an alternative to conventional development as a way to reduce poverty in the Third World (
Indigenous knowledge can be defined as a set of strategies, practices, tools, explanations, beliefs, intellectual sources, and other values accumulated through time by indigenous communities without interference or involvement of hegemonies or external forces (
Grasshoppers are one of the more diverse taxa in the world (
Study site.—This study was conducted in villages in the forest areas of the southern Cameroon plateau (between 3°27'N, 11°32'E and 4°10'N, 11°49'E). This area covers almost 42% of Cameroon and is a vast plateau of about 650 m a.s.l., belonging to a strip of plateau that forms the north and west edges of the Congo basin (
Surveys and data analysis.—A total of 341 people were interviewed individually in the 24 villages selected. Rapid rural appraisal methods (RRA) (
The population studied consisted of 58.9% males (201 respondents) and 41.1% females (140 respondents) (Table
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents in the investigated divisions. Each value represents a frequency in % (number of respondents); N = size of the sample; p value = probability; χ2 = value of the Kruskal-Wallis test. The letters a, b, and c represent the results of the Mann-Whitney test for two samples in the same column; the same letter indicates non-significant differences between the values.
Comparison parameters | Mbam and Inoubou | Mbam and Kim | Mefou and Akono | Nyong and Kelle | Mvilla | Valley of Ntem | Sanaga Maritime | High Nyong | χ 2 | P value | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | |||||||||||
Male | 58.9(50) | 43.3(13) | 48.5(16) | 64.5(20) | 59.0(36) | 73.7(28) | 40.0(12) | 78.8(26) | 14.2 | 0.006 | 58.9(201) |
Female | 41.1(35) | 56.7(17) | 51.5(17) | 35.5(11) | 41.0(25) | 26.3(10) | 60.0(18) | 21.2(7) | 14.2 | 0.006 | 41.1(140) |
χ2 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 0.04 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 12.6 | 1.8 | 16.6 | 15.3 | ||
p value | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.02 | 0.04 | <0.001 | 0.1 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 | ||
Age (in years) | |||||||||||
18 – 30 | 36.5(31)a | 56.7(17)a | 42.4(14)a | 6.4(2)a | 57.4(35)a | 36.8(14)a | 23.3(7)ab | 51.5(17)a | 21.9 | < 0.001 | 40.1(137)a |
31 – 40 | 21.2(18)b | 16.7(5)b | 18.2(6)b | 35.5(11)b | 16.4(10)b | 23.7(9)ab | 46.6(14)b | 12.1(4)b | 9.4 | 0.01 | 22.6(77)b |
41 – 50 | 17.6(15)b | 3.3(1)b | 9.1(3)b | 9.7(3)a | 6.6(4)b | 21.1(8)ab | 16.7(5)a | 9.1(3)bc | 3.4 | 0.2 | 12.3(42)c |
51 – 60 | 11.8(10)b | 10.0(3)b | 30.3(10)ab | 19.4(6)ab | 9.8(6)b | 10.5(4)b | 6.7(2)a | 27.3(9)b | 5.7 | 0.03 | 14.7(50)c |
Above 60 | 12.9(11)b | 13.3(4)b | 0.0(0)c | 29.0(9)b | 9.8(6)b | 7.9(3)b | 6.7(2)a | 0.0(0)c | 6.1 | 0.002 | 10.3(35)c |
χ2 | 10.1 | 15.9 | 11.1 | 5.8 | 32.8 | 6.1 | 9.7 | 15.5 | 61.3 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.02 | < 0.001 | 0.01 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 | ||
Background | |||||||||||
unschooled | 8.2(7)b | 0.0(0)c | 6.0(2)b | 6.5(2)c | 1.6(1)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 21.2(7)a | 3.8 | 0.001 | 5.6(19)a |
Primary | 34.1(29)a | 16.7(5)a | 39.4(13)a | 29.0(9)a | 18.0(11)a | 36.8(14)a | 40.0(12)a | 24.2(8)a | 7.3 | 0.01 | 29.6(101)b |
High school | 45.9(39)a | 76.7(23)ab | 36.4(12)a | 54.8(17)b | 68.9(42)b | 52.7(20)a | 46.7(14)a | 45.5(15)b | 47.6 | < 0.001 | 53.4(182)c |
University | 11.8(10)b | 6.6(2)ab | 18.2(6)ab | 9.7(3)c | 11.5(7)a | 10.5(4)b | 13.3(4)b | 9.1(3)a | 0.8 | 0.9 | 11.4(39)d |
χ2 | 24.8 | 33.0 | 7.3 | 13.7 | 53.7 | 19.7 | 12.9 | 6.7 | 142.7 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.004 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.007 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 |
Only one respondent said he did not know what a grasshopper is. In general, in all the villages, the respondents said that they know these insects (99.7%) from their personal experiences (50.4%) or from school (48.7%). Some (33.7%) got their experience from their neighbors and 18.8% from the media. The people surveyed said that they used general coloring (80.1%), form (66.9%) or odor (30.2%) to recognize grasshoppers, with color predominating in some divisions, and form predominating in others (Table
Recognition of grasshoppers by local people. Frequency in % (number of respondents); N = size of the sample; p value = probability; χ2 = value of the Kruskal-Wallis test. The letters a, b, and c represent the results of the Mann-Whitney test for two samples in the same column; the same letter indicates non-significant differences between the values.
Comparison parameters | Mbam and Inoubou | Mbam and Kim | Mefou and Akono | Nyong and Kelle | Mvilla | Valley of Ntem | Sanaga Maritime | High Nyong | χ 2 | p value | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge of grasshoppers | |||||||||||
Yes | 100.0(85) | 100.0(30) | 100.0(33) | 100.0(31) | 100.0(61) | 100.0(38) | 100.0(30) | 97.0(32) | 0.08 | 0.2 | 99.7(340) |
No | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0) | 3.0(1) | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.3(1) |
χ2 | 126.8 | 44.3 | 45.8 | 45.7 | 90.8 | 56.3 | 44.3 | 44.4 | 506.3 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 | ||
Where knowledge was gained | |||||||||||
School | 47.1(40)a | 90.0(27)a | 36.4(12)a | 71.0(22)a | 21.3(13)a | 28.9(11)a | 76.7(23)a | 54.5(18)a | 43.3 | < 0.001 | 48.7(166)a |
Media | 25.9(22)b | 23.3(7)b | 15.2(5)b | 19.3(6)b | 1.6(1)b | 7.9(3)b | 50.0(15)b | 15.2(5)b | 17.8 | < 0.001 | 18.8(64)b |
Neighbor | 24.7(21)b | 10.0(3)b | 18.2(6)ab | 54.8(17)a | 18.0(11)a | 60.5(23)c | 53.3(16)ab | 54.5(18)a | 32.7 | < 0.001 | 33.7(115)c |
Personal experience | 61.2(52)a | 33.3(10)b | 63.6(21)c | 32.3(10)b | 90.2(55)c | 26.3(10)a | 23.3(7)c | 21.2(7)b | 68.6 | < 0.001 | 50.4(172)a |
χ2 | 23.7 | 30.2 | 14.9 | 14.7 | 84.1 | 16.2 | 12.8 | 13.2 | 67.2 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 | ||
Recognition of grasshoppers | |||||||||||
Form | 83.5(71)a | 93.3(28)a | 66.7(22)a | 90.3(28)a | 32.8(20)a | 60.5(23)a | 70.0(21) | 45.5(15) | 47.6 | < 0.001 | 66.9(228)a |
Color | 94.1(80)b | 70.0(21)b | 54.5(18)a | 80.6(25)a | 96.7(59)b | 86.8(33)b | 53.3(16) | 63.6(21) | 27.1 | < 0.001 | 80.1(273)b |
Odor | 43.5(37)c | 20.0(6)c | 27.3(9)b | 19.4(6)b | 18.0(11)c | 18.4(7)c | 40.0(12) | 45.5(15) | 13.8 | 0.003 | 30.2(103)a |
χ2 | 36.2 | 26.7 | 7.9 | 24.8 | 63.6 | 26.9 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 57.7 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.004 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.7 | 0.2 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 |
The data shows that most villagers reported that grasshoppers were in all landscapes (79.8%) (Table
Landscapes reported as habitats for grasshoppers in the divisions studied. Frequency in % (number of respondents); N = size of the sample; p value = probability; χ2 = value of the Kruskal-Wallis test. The letters a, b, and c represent the results of the Mann-Whitney test for two samples in the same column; the same letter indicates non-significant differences between the values.
Landscapes | Mbam and Inoubou | Mbam and Kim | Mefou and Akono | Nyong and Kelle | Mvilla | Valley of Ntem | Sanaga Maritime | High Nyong | χ 2 | p value | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All landscapes | 82.4(70)c | 70.0(21)c | 84.8(28)c | 100.0(31)a | 100.0(61)a | 68.4(26)a | 63.3(19)c | 48.5(16)c | 26.1 | < 0.001 | 79.8(272)c |
Forest | 2.4(2)b | 3.3(1)a | 12.1(4)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0b) | 7.9(3)b | 26.7(8)ab | 24.2(8)b | 6.1 | < 0.001 | 7.6(26)a |
Fallow | 9.4(8)ab | 6.7(2)ab | 12.1(4)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 15.8(6)b | 16.7(5)ab | 24.2(8)b | 5.7 | 0.002 | 9.7(33)a |
Crop fields | 14.1(12)a | 20.0(6)b | 9.1(3)ab | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0b) | 21.1(8)b | 36.7(11)b | 48.5(16)c | 22.3 | < 0.001 | 16.4(56)b |
House | 16.5(14)a | 16.7(5)ab | 0.0(0)a | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 10.5(4)b | 10.0(3)a | 3.(1)a | 4.9 | 0.001 | 7.9(27)a |
χ2 | 107.8 | 26.0 | 47.1 | 73.9 | 154.9 | 28.2 | 17.0 | 14.5 | 398.6 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 |
The grasshoppers were called by many names, depending on the village and language: “Etandak” in the Beti language (Mefou and Akono, Mvilla and Valley of Ntem divisions), “Gomatataї” and “Ketataї” in the Bafia language (Mbam and Inoubou division), “Kanè” in the Mvouté language (Mbam and Kim division), “Ndenga” in the Bassa language (Nyong and Kelle and Sanaga Maritime), and “Atjembeka” in the Nvjem language (High Nyong division).
In general, species-specific names do not exist in these villages, with the exception of Z. variegatus, called “Mbakssana” in the Beti language and “Ikadjala” in the Nvjem language. However, 23 species were recognized by the local people : Parapetasia femorata Bolívar, 1884, Dictyophorus karschi (Bolívar, 1904), Mazea granulosa Stål, 1876, and Gemeneta terrea Karsch, 1892 in forest; Odontomelus kamerunensis Ramme, 1929, Cyphocerastis tristis Karsch, 1892, and Eupropacris coerulea (Drury, 1770) in fallow, crop fields, and forests; Pteropera balachowskyi Donskoff, 1981 and Pteropera mirei Donskoff, 1981 in fallow lands and forest; Zonocerus variegatus (Linnaeus, 1758), Oxycatantops spissus (Walker, 1870), Taphronota ferruginea (Fabricius, 1781), Chirista compta (Walker, 1870), and Acanthacris ruficornis (Fabricius, 1787) in fallow lands and crop fields; Heteropternis thoracica (Walker, 1970) and Pyrgomorpha vignaudii (Guérin-Méneville, 1849) near houses, in fallow lands, and in crop fields; Spathosternum pygmaeum Karsch, 1893, near houses and in fallow lands; Gymnobothrus temporalis (Stål, 1876), Abisares viridipennis (Burmeister, 1838), Catantops stramineus (Walker, 1870) and Afroxyrrhepes obscuripes Uvarov, 1943, only in fallow lands; Atractomorpha acutipennis (Guérin-Méneville, 1844) and Eucoptacra anguliflava (Karsch, 1893) near houses, in fallow lands, in crop fields, and in forest (Appendix
Crop fields were cited most often as having an abundant number of grasshoppers (45.7%), while fallow areas were cited as having only moderate levels (38.7%) (Fig.
In all the divisions visited, the respondents recognized grasshoppers as both useful and harmful in Mbam and Kim (100%), Mefou and Akono (94%), Nyong and Kelle (93.5%), Mvilla (91.8%), Sanaga Maritime (90%), Mbam and Inoubou (88.2%), High Nyong (63.6%), and Valley of Ntem (50%) (Fig.
Harmful effects of grasshoppers.—In general, in all the divisions, the most harmful action of grasshoppers reported by respondents was damage to crops (Fig.
Grasshoppers cited as crop pests.—In all divisions visited, respondents recognized all grasshopper species as crop pests (51%) (Table
Pest grasshoppers cited by local people. Frequency in % (number of respondents); N = size of the sample; p value = probability; χ2 = value of the Kruskal-Wallis test. The letters a, b, c, and d represent the results of the Mann-Whitney test for two samples in the same column; the same letter indicates non-significant differences between the values.
Grasshoppers species | Mbam and Inoubou | Mbam and Kim | Mefou and Akono | Nyong and Kelle | Mvilla | Valley of Ntem | Sanaga Maritime | High Nyong | χ 2 | p value | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All the species | 67.1(57)a | 63.3(19)a | 42.4(14)a | 51.6(16)a | 32.8(20)a | 31.6(12)a | 73.3(22)a | 42.4(14)a | 24.2 | < 0.001 | 51.0(174)a |
Zonocerus variegatus | 28.2(24)b | 53.3(16)b | 30.3(10)b | 38.7(12)a | 55.7(34)b | 31.6(12)a | 13.3(4)b | 3.0(1)b | 25.5 | < 0.001 | 33.1(113)b |
Taphronota ferruginea | 2.4(2)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6(2)c |
Acanthacris ruficornis | 1.2(1)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 1.6(1)cd | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.05 | 0.9 | 0.6(2)c |
Atractomorpha acutipennis | 1.2(1)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 3.3(2)cd | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.9(3)cd |
Pyrgomorpha vignaudii | 1.2(1)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 6.6(4)d | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.6 | 0.06 | 1.5(5)cd |
Oxycatantops spissus | 1.2(1)c | 16.7(5)c | 6.1(2)c | 0.0(0)b | 6.6(4)d | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 2.6 | < 0.001 | 3.5(12)d |
χ2 | 97.8 | 41.2 | 18.4 | 27.7 | 48.5 | 16.2 | 40.2 | 14.9 | 258.7 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 |
Developmental stage of crop pests.—Except in the Sanaga Maritime (12%), Valley of Ntem (7.9%), and High Nyong (3%) divisions, the most frequent pest grasshopper stages reported by respondents were both adults and nymphs (Fig.
Crops cited as most often damaged by pest grasshoppers.—The crops most cited by the respondents as affected by pest grasshoppers were cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, 1766) (60.1%), corn (Zea mays L., 1753) (58.1%), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L., 1753) (35.5%), and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench, 1794) (27.9%) (Table
Crops cited by local people as damaged by pest grasshoppers. Frequency in % (number of respondents); N = size of the sample; p value = probability; χ2 = value of the Kruskal-Wallis test. The letters a, b, c, d, e, and f represent the results of the Mann-Whitney test for two samples in the same column; the same letter indicates non-significant differences between the values.
Crops | Mbam and Inoubou | Mbam and Kim | Mefou and Akono | Nyong and Kelle | Mvilla | Valley of Ntem | Sanaga Maritime | High Nyong | χ 2 | p value | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corn | 67.1(57)a | 83.3(25)a | 48.5(16)a | 90.3(28)a | 55.8(34)a | 21.1(8)a | 50.0(15)a | 45.5(15)a | 36.2 | < 0.001 | 58.1(198)a |
Cassava | 81.2(69)b | 66.7(20)a | 48.5(16)a | 71.0(22)ab | 73.8(45)b | 28.9(11)a | 40.0(12)a | 30.3(10)ab | 44.5 | < 0.001 | 60.1(205)a |
Groundnut | 43.5(37)c | 13.3(4)b | 30.3(10)ab | 16.1(5)c | 59.0(36)a | 34.2(13)a | 30.0(9)ab | 21.2(7)bc | 23.5 | < 0.001 | 35.5(121)b |
Green vegetables | 27.1(23)d | 16.7(5)b | 3.0(1)c | 19.4(6)c | 19.7(12)c | 0.0(0)b | 10.0(3)b | 9.1(3)bc | 8.8 | 0.002 | 15.5(53)c |
Okra | 20.0(17)de | 66.7(20)a | 21.2(7)b | 48.4(15)bd | 31.1(19)c | 23.7(9)a | 16.7(5)b | 9.1(3)bc | 24.4 | < 0.001 | 27.9(95)d |
Cucumber | 12.9(11)e | 10.0(3)c | 3.0(1)c | 0.0(0)e | 8.2(5)c | 15.8(6)a | 3.3(1)c | 12.(4)bc | 1.8 | 0.5 | 9.1(31)e |
Bean | 5.9(5)ef | 3.3(1)d | 6.1(2)c | 12.9(4)f | 9.8(6)c | 0.0(0)b | 3.3(1)c | 6.1(2)c | 1.0 | 0.4 | 6.2(21)ef |
Bitter leaf | 3.5(3)f | 0.0(0)d | 3.0(1)c | 0.0(0)e | 0.0(0)d | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 12.(4)bc | 8.7 | < 0.001 | 2.3(8)g |
Sweet potato | 0.0(0)f | 0.0(0)d | 6.1(2)c | 32.3(10)d | 9.8(6)c | 0.0(0)b | 16.7(5)b | 6.1(2)c | 1.9 | 0.02 | 7.3(25)ef |
Macobo-cocoyam | 0.0(0)f | 0.0(0)d | 0.0(0)c | 6.5(2)f | 19.7(12)c | 0.0(0)b | 6.7(2)b | 6.1(2)c | 5.4 | < 0.001 | 5.3(18)f |
χ2 | 190.4 | 86.5 | 29.9 | 79.8 | 108.5 | 19.7 | 23.8 | 13.9 | 437.6 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 |
Impact of pests on crops productivity.—Cassava was most cited (32.3%) as suffering high losses (75–100%) due to pest grasshoppers, followed by corn (12.6%), green vegetable (12.3%), and groundnut (8.2%) (Fig.
Methods known and used to control pest grasshoppers.—The conventional grasshopper control methods cited by respondents were insecticides, weeding, picking by hand, and the use of improved seeds (Table
Methods for controlling pest grasshoppers cited and used by local people. Frequency in % (number of respondents); N = size of the sample; p value = probability; χ2 = value of the Kruskal-Wallis test. The letters a, b, c, d, and e represent the results of the Mann-Whitney test for two samples in the same column; the same letter indicates non-significant differences between the values.
Methods of control | Mbam and Inoubou | Mbam and Kim | Mefou and Akono | Nyong and Kelle | Mvilla | Valley of Ntem | Sanaga Maritime | High Nyong | χ 2 | p value | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional methods | |||||||||||
Insecticide | 69.4(59)a | 50.0(15)a | 24.2(8)a | 29.0(25)a | 37.7(23)a | 57.8(22)a | 46.6(14)a | 39.4(13)a | 28.8 | < 0.001 | 52.5(179)a |
Weeding | 7.1(6)b | 0.0(0)b | 21.2(7)a | 3.2(1)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 3.0(1)b | 3.9 | < 0.001 | 4.5(15)b |
Picking | 2.4(2)b | 0.0(0)b | 42.4(14)b | 38.7(12)c | 19.7(12)c | 7.9(3)b | 0.0(0)b | 9.1(3)b | 21.5 | < 0.001 | 13.5(46)c |
Improved seed | 2.4(2)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6(2)d |
χ2 | 81.1 | 16.7 | 8.9 | 36.3 | 17.9 | 26.4 | 14.6 | 9.9 | 173.6 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 | ||
Traditional methods | |||||||||||
Smoke | 5.9(5)a | 30.0(9)a | 3.0(1) | 0.0(0)a | 3.3(2) | 10.5(4)a | 13.3(4)a | 6.1(2) | 6.1 | < 0.001 | 7.9(27)a |
Ashes | 36.5(31)b | 33.3(10)a | 3.0(1) | 35.5(11)b | 1.6(1) | 0.0(0)b | 20.0(6)a | 12.1(4) | 25.0 | < 0.001 | 18.8(64)b |
Litter | 1.2(1)c | 13.3(4)a | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)a | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)b | 10.0(3)ab | 6.1%(2) | 1.9 | 0.003 | 2.3(10)c |
Paracetamol | 1.2(1)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)a | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.(0) | 0.03 | 0.9 | 0.3(1)d |
Cow dung | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)a | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)b | 3.3(1)ab | 0.0(0) | 0.08 | 0.3 | 0.3(1)d |
Hot pepper water | 0.0(0)c | 23.3(7)a | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)a | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0) | 4.5 | < 0.001 | 2.1 (7)ce |
Bell sounds | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0) | 6.5(2)c | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 6.1(2) | 0.6 | 0.02 | 1.2(4)ce |
Tobacco leaf water | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)a | 0.0(0) | 0.0(0)b | 0.0(0)b | 3.0(1) | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.3(1)d |
χ2 | 28.5 | 13.3 | 0.1 | 10.0 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 29.3 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.5 | < 0.001 | 0.2 | < 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.2 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 |
Efficiencies of the methods used to control pest grasshoppers.—Insecticides were considered to be most effective in removing grasshoppers, with 26.7% of respondents saying that insecticides can remove 75–100% of the grasshoppers in crop fields, although 1.5% said they were not very effective, removing less than 25% (Fig.
Grasshoppers were reported as used mainly as food (86.8%), but also sold at markets (57.7%), used as fishing bait (13.2%), or to treat diseases (10.9%) (Table
Importance of grasshoppers cited by local people. Frequency in % (number of respondents); N = size of the sample; p value = probability; χ2 = value of the Kruskal-Wallis test. The letters a, b, c, and d represent the results of the Mann-Whitney test for two samples in the same column; the same letter indicates non-significant differences between the values.
Uses | Mbam and Inoubou | Mbam and Kim | Mefou and Akono | Nyong and Kelle | Mvilla | Valley of Ntem | Sanaga Maritime | High Nyong | χ 2 | p value | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food | 89.4(76)a | 100.0(30)a | 93.9(31)a | 83.8(26)a | 95.1(58)a | 57.8(22)a | 90.0(27)a | 78.8(26)a | 13.8 | < 0.001 | 86.8(296)a |
Commerce | 57.6(49)b | 76.7(23)b | 72.7(24)b | 77.4(24)a | 32.8(20)b | 34.2(13)b | 66.7(20)b | 72.7(24)a | 29.6 | < 0.001 | 57.7(197)b |
Treat diseases | 17.6(15)c | 0.0(0)c | 6.1(2)c | 32.2(10)b | 3.3(2)c | 21.1(8)bc | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 11.2 | < 0.001 | 10.9(37)c |
Charming medium | 2.4(2)d | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 10.5(4)bc | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 1.2 | 0.04 | 1.8(6)d |
Fishing bait | 16.5(14)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 21.3(13)b | 36.8(14)ab | 0.0(0)c | 12.1(4)c | 14.3 | < 0.001 | 13.2(45)c |
Pollinator agent | 1.2(1)d | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)cd | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.03 | 0.9 | 0.3(1)d |
Biological control | 1.2(1)d | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)cd | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.03 | 0.9 | 0.3(1)d |
Ecosystem balance | 0.0(0)d | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)c | 7.9(3)c | 0.0(0)c | 0.0(0)b | 0.6 | 0.001 | 0.9(3)d |
χ2 | 193.3 | 107.3 | 102.8 | 86.9 | 140.2 | 33.5 | 84.9 | 81.8 | 764.6 | ||
p value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
N | 85 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 61 | 38 | 30 | 33 | 341 |
Types of grasshoppers eaten and commercialized.—Zonocerus variegatus and Oxycatantops spissus (Fig.
Some grasshoppers mainly used/cited by local people: Zonocerus variegatus (pest of crops, fallowland species, use as food and to treat diseases) (A), Oxycatantops spissus (pest of crops, fallowland species, use as food and to treat diseases) (B), Atractomorpha acutipennis (pest of crops, species of forest edge and fallow, use to treat diseases) (C), Parapetasia femorata (forest species, use as indicator to characterize forest ecosystems) (D), Mazea granulosa (forest species, use as indicator to characterize forest ecosystems) (E), Gemeneta terrea (forest species, use as indicator to characterize forest ecosystems) (F).
Grasshoppers and other Orthopterans cited by local people as eaten and sold commercially.
Species/Family | Consummation forms | Commercialization forms | Divisions |
---|---|---|---|
Zonocerus variegatus | fried or braised | fresh or fried | Mbam and Inoubou, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, High Nyong, Mefou and Akono, Nyong and Kelle |
Oxycatantops spissus | fried or braised | fresh | Mbam and Inoubou |
Tettigonidae | fried or braised | fresh or fried | All the divisions |
Gryllidae | fried or braised | not sold | Mbam and Inoubou |
Diseases treated with grasshoppers.—Zonocerus variegatus (Fig.
Our data allow an assessment of the perception of grasshoppers by local people in Southern Cameroon, particularly in terms of food, health, and landscape conservation. Grasshoppers are known to be herbivore insects common to grassland ecosystems worldwide (
Our study shows that the local people understand that the abundance of grasshoppers increases with the degradation or opening of forests: grasshoppers were reported to be rare in pristine forests and abundant in much degraded forests, which is consistent with
The respondents said grasshoppers were present in all climatic seasons, but more abundant during the dry seasons.
In general, respondents recognized grasshoppers as being both useful and harmful. They reported that all species consume crops, but only Z. variegatus was recognized as a pest with economic impact. According to
Our data reveal that the villagers felt that insecticides were the most effective method to control pest grasshoppers, but because of the high cost of chemical insecticides, most farmers used weeding and picking by hand; biological and ecological methods were not mentioned. Worldwide, most locust and grasshopper management programs still rely on chemical pesticides (
Most of the respondents (85.9%) in our study said grasshoppers are used as food in addition to Tettigonidae and Gryllidae, and the grasshopper species consumed by the local people are Z. variegatus and O. spissus. Orthoptera species are used as food in many parts of the world, such as Australia, India, South America, and Africa (
Zonocerus variegatus, Atractomorpha acutipennis, and Oxycatantops spissus are used by local people to treat spleen pain, burns, tuberculosis, angina, malaria, stomachaches, and anal tingling. Grasshoppers are considered to have therapeutic value in Australia, India, South America, and Africa (
All these examples demonstrate that, as in many regions of the world, diverse use is made of grasshoppers in southern Cameroon, whether as a food source, remedies, or as indicators of environmental change. In addition, numerous local solutions (of varying effectiveness) are used to control pest species. It is important to continue to identify, understand, and develop this traditional knowledge as a possible source or at least partial solution to some of the environmental changes currently underway.
This work was partially made possible by a Rufford Small Grant (ID application: 19665-1) from the Rufford Foundation: we did the surveys during our sensitizations against deforestation in the divisions of Mefou and Akono, Valley of Ntem, and Mvilla. We warmly thank all the inhabitants interviewed during our field trips for their cooperation. We also thank Mrs Guy Raoul Saroua, Ngan, Joseph Romuald Fotso Njonkam, Martin Lutter Nkoulou, Annette Friede Hell, and Maurice Nkoulou, who helped in the survey in the divisions of Valley of Ntem, Nyong and Kelle, Mbam and Inoubou, High Nyong, and Sanaga Maritime.
Grasshoppers recognized by local people in the different landscapes; + indicates species recognized as present by villagers.
Sub-Familly | Grasshoppers species | House | Fallow | Crop | Forest | Divisions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acridinae | Chirista compta | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, Sanaga Maritime | ||
Gymnobothrus temporalis | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mefou and Akono, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | ||||
Odontomelus kamerunensis | + | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Nyong and Kelle, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | ||
Catantopinae | Abisares viridipennis | + | Mbam and Inoubou | |||
Catantops stramineus | + | Nyong and Kelle, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | ||||
Eupropacris coerulea | + | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Nyong and Kelle, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | ||
Gemeneta terrea | + | Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Mvilla | ||||
Mazea granulosa | + | Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | ||||
Catantopinae | Oxycatantops spissus | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Nyong and Kelle, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, Sanaga Maritime | ||
Pteropera balakoswki | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mefou and Akono, Valley of Ntem | |||
Pteropera mirei | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mefou and Akono, Mvilla | |||
Coptacrinae | Cyphocerastis tristis | + | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, High Nyong | |
Eucoptacra anguliflava | + | + | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mvilla | |
Cyrtacantacridinae | Acanthacris ruficornis | + | + | Mbam and Kim, Mvilla | ||
Spathosterninae | Spathosternum pygmaeum | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | ||
Oedipodinae | Heteropternis thoracica | + | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | |
Pyrgomorphinae | Atractomorpha acutipennis | + | + | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Nyong and Kelle, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, High Nyong, Sanaga Maritime |
Dictyophorus karschi | + | Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, Mbam and Kim | ||||
Parapetasia femorata | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Nyong and Kelle, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, High Nyong | ||||
Pyrgomorpha vignaudii | + | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, Sanaga Maritime | ||
Taphronota ferruginea | + | + | Mefou and Akono, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem | |||
Zonocerus variegatus | + | + | Mbam and Inoubou, Mbam and Kim, Mefou and Akono, Nyong and Kelle, Mvilla, Valley of Ntem, High Nyong, Sanaga Maritime | |||
Tropidopolinae | Afroxyrrhepes obscuripes | + | Mbam and Inoubou |
Grasshoppers species | Diseases/cultural uses | Preparation | Posology | Divisions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zonocerus variegatus | Spleen pain | Crush the grasshopper and extract its oil | Scarify the patient with spines of the grasshopper’s legs and rub oil extracted | Mbam and Inoubou, Mvilla |
Spleen pain | Remove head and viscera of the grasshopper, wash with boiling water, and cook in cucumber dishes | Eat in three days | Mbam and Inoubou | |
Spleen pain | Crush the grasshopper and mix with water | Purge the patient with the solution | Valley of Ntem | |
Scabies and burns | Crush the grasshopper and mix with red palm oil | Rub on the scabies or burns | Valley of Ntem | |
Belly swollen of children | Remove head and viscera of the grasshopper, wash with boiling water, fry, and mix with red palm oil | Eat once daily until disease regression | Mbam and Inoubou | |
Tuberculosis | Remove head and viscera of the grasshopper, wash with boiling water, and cook in cucumber dishes | Eat daily until disease regression | Mbam and Inoubou | |
Angina | Crush the head and viscera grasshopper and mix with “the king of grass” Algeratum conizoides | Rub on the throat every day during illness | Mvilla | |
Malaria | Put the grasshopper on the child so the child is stung by its spines | High Nyong | ||
Burn | Burn and crush the grasshopper and mix it with a little water | Rub on the wound | Mefou and Akono | |
Anal itching of children of 2 to 3 years old | Crush head and viscera of the grasshopper and mix with “the king of grass” Algeratum conizoides | Purge the patient with the solution | Nyong and Kelle | |
Anal itching of children of 2 to 3 years | Sting three times the anus of child with the spines of grasshopper | Nyong and Kelle | ||
Atractomorpha acutipennis | « abobo » disease of the baby’s fontanelle | Crush grasshoppers | Rub on the fontanelle | Valley of Ntem |
luck | Viewed in the forest by a hunter reflects a successful hunt | Mefou and Akono | ||
Oxycatantops spissus | Burns and painful menstruation of women | Remove head and viscera of the grasshopper, wash with boiling water, and cook in dishes or cucumber sauces | Eat during the period of menstruation | Mbam and Inoubou |
Spleen pain | Scarify the child at the hip with the spines of grasshopper’s legs | Mvilla | ||
Charming medium | Remove grasshopper viscera and cook it with smoked freshwater fish in cucumber dishes | Give food only to the person you want to charm | Mbam and Kim |
Data type: Survey sheet
Explanation note: Grasshoppers Survey sheet. This survey sheet was used in the villages to collect informations about grasshoppers.