Short Communication |
Corresponding author: Tim Gardiner ( tim.gardiner@environment-agency.gov.uk ) Academic editor: Maria-Marta Cigliano
© 2020 Tim Gardiner.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gardiner T (2020) Slipping a disc! Utilisation of harrowed strips by Orthoptera on a Breckland grass-heath. Journal of Orthoptera Research 29(2): 127-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.29.51900
|
On a Breckland grass heath in eastern England, soil disturbance methods such as disc harrowing employed to benefit endangered plants such as tower mustard, Arabis glabra, could also create exposed ground for localized insects, specifically the mottled grasshopper, Myrmeleotettix maculatus. Orthoptera of disc-harrowed strips on a grass heath at Santon Warren in Norfolk, UK, were monitored in 2018 and 2019. Data analysis focused on two target species, field grasshopper, Chorthippus brunneus, and M. maculatus, which are likely to respond positively to the creation of early successional habitat. Of the two species, M. maculatus was found in significantly high abundance on the disc-harrowed strips, whereas C. brunneus was not. The species richness of Orthoptera did not appear affected by harrowing, although three species at this location (lesser marsh grasshopper, Chorthippus albomarginatus, long-winged conehead, Conocephalus fuscus, and Roesel’s bush-cricket, Roseliana roeselii) need taller vegetation than was present on the disc-harrowed strips.
Acrididae, bare earth, bush-crickets, conservation, grasshoppers, heathland, Tettigoniidae
Breckland is a biodiversity hotspot in the UK; 25,500 species were recorded in a recent audit led by the University of East Anglia (
Different grasshopper species have contrasting microclimatic preferences (humidity and temperature) that drive the diversity of assemblages (
Responses to microclimatic temperatures differ between species. For example, the mottled grasshopper, Myrmeleotettix maculatus, is a short sward specialist, and its small size may be an adaptation for the high temperatures it experiences (
Myrmeleotettix maculatus
was the scarcest species recorded in a recent survey of Breckland (
It is the aim of this short communication to determine the initial impact of the soil disturbance technique of disc harrowing on Orthoptera of a grass heath in Breckland, UK, focusing on two disturbance-dependent species: C. brunneus and M. maculatus.
Site.— The study site on Santon Warren (52°27'43.2468"N, 0°40'23.8224"E) in Breckland, Suffolk, UK, was a grass heath composed of fine-leaved grasses (Agrostis and Festuca spp.) with rare annual plants (tower mustard, Arabis glabra) dependent on soil disturbance for their persistence. The grass and lichen heath developed on a sandy soil (with flint) and underlying chalk bedrock. Formerly, rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) grazing checked grass growth and scrub development, but since the myxomatosis outbreak in the 1960s, this influence has declined. Therefore, other methods of creating bare ground were required to encourage the proliferation of rare plants.
Soil disturbance technique.—Two strips of grass heath (300 m length) with little exposed bare ground (<10%) were randomly selected for soil disturbance with agricultural discs attached to the back of a tractor. The primary aim of disc harrowing in this area was to promote the abundance of the plant A. glabra (Neal Armour-Chelu personal communication). The vertical discs harrowed the surface and upper layers of the soil (
Orthoptera
sampling methods.—In each disc-harrowed strip and in an adjacent control strip, a 1-m wide x 300-m long transect (the same length for the disc-harrowed strip and the control) was established, closely following the methodology of
Each transect was walked at a slow, strolling pace (2 km/hr) from May–July of 2018 and 2019 (5 surveys in each year, 10 in total). Nymphs flushed from a 1-m wide band in front of the observer were recorded along the center of the 2.5 m harrowed strip and in the control. As it is difficult to distinguish between species in the early instars, nymphs of both species were lumped together for recording purposes. The surveys were undertaken in vegetation sufficiently short (<50 cm) to minimize the possibility of overlooking nymphs in tall grass (
Statistical analysis.—The counts for each transect were standardized to 0.1 ha to give a clearer indication of usage of strips and control. To correct for non-normality, the data for both grasshopper species and the species richness were square-root transformed (
A total of 811 nymphs (70% of total recorded) were observed on the disc-harrowed strips in both years combined, compared to 353 on the control transects. Adults of both species were numerous (both years combined, C. brunneus: 729 individuals, M. maculatus: 559). The disturbance-dependent species M. maculatus was almost exclusively recorded on the disc-harrowed transects (552 adults observed, 99% of total) compared to the control (just 7 adults). Adults of C. brunneus were more evenly distributed (434, or 60%, on disc-harrowed transects and 295 on control).
Densities of nymphs (Fig.
Overall, five species of Orthoptera were recorded on the sparsely vegetated disc-harrowed strips and eight on the controls (Table
Species of Orthoptera recorded on disc-harrowed strips and unmanaged controls.
Species | Disc-harrowed | Control | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Chorthippus brunneus | 434 | 295 | 729 |
Myrmeleotettix maculatus | 552 | 7 | 559 |
Stenobothrus lineatus | 15 | 16 | 31 |
Omocestus viridulus | 4 | 16 | 20 |
Roeseliana roeselii | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Pseudochorthippus parallelus | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Chorthippus albomarginatus | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Conocephalus fuscus | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Total | 1007 | 355 | 1362 |
In many grasslands, grazing can create patches of bare earth (through trampling of the soil by hooves) that provides an environment for grasshopper oviposition and basking (
In this study, M. maculatus was almost exclusively found on the soil disturbed strips when compared to unmanaged dry heath, a similar situation to other Breckland soil disturbance studies. In research plots at nearby Stanford Training Area (STANTA), 60 M. maculatus were recorded in pitfall traps on cultivated grass heath, whereas none were captured in undisturbed controls (Robert Hawkes personal communication). The grasshopper is at an advantage on exposed soil, particularly where there is a high stone content, due to its mottled coloration that provides excellent camouflage (
In the pioneering Breckland study by
The most abundant grasshopper, C. brunneus, had no preference for the disc-harrowed strips. In a study of its response to sward height in Essex, C. brunneus preferred grasslands with swards 10–20 cm in height (
The 2.5 m-wide strips were probably too narrow to fulfil all the needs of either grasshopper species, probably with frequent movements between the exposed soil and adjacent grass heath. Adults of M. maculatus were abundant on the strips: perhaps they utilized the exposed ground for basking and oviposition.
In reality, soil disturbance is undertaken to conserve rarer species than the orthopterans recorded in this study. The primary driver at Santon Warren is the conservation of the endangered plant A. glabra. The favorable habitat for M. maculatus demonstrates a knock-on benefit for a non-target insect. It is possible that disc harrowing may also benefit other invertebrates that require soil disturbance, such as the declining small heath butterfly, Coenonympha pamphilus, that was regularly sighted on the strips. Green tiger beetles, Cicindela campestris, were also seen on the disc-harrowed strips along with many species of Hymenoptera.
This small-scale study presents evidence that soil disturbance on a grass heath using a disc harrow may produce enhanced habitat for localized disturbance-dependent species such as M. maculatus. Although orthopteran species richness was unaffected by disc harrowing, the strips may be too hot or bare of vegetation for species not recorded on the strips, such as the bush-crickets C. fuscus and R. roeselii (Table
I would like to thank Neal Armour-Chelu of Forest Research, Forestry Commission, for providing much needed advice and information about the soil disturbance strips. Dr. Robert Hawkes of the University of East Anglia (UEA) offered advice on the response of invertebrates to soil disturbance interventions and also supplied supplementary data for M. maculatus from STANTA. Finally, I am thankful for constructive reviews from Dr. Dragan Chobanov and Luc Willemse and to Dr. Maria-Marta Cigliano for her editorial guidance.