<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://jor.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">64</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:6C784C0A-AA9D-55EB-9F58-D64D99DC4BC4</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F491333-DE0B-4C9F-A392-B7AE8C41CE13</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Orthoptera Research</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">JOR</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1082-6467</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1937-2426</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/jor.35.185742</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">185742</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Behavioural Ecology</subject>
          <subject>Biogeography</subject>
          <subject>Faunistics &amp; Distribution</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Americas</subject>
          <subject>South America</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Integrative insights into the ecology, development, and chromatic polymorphism of the Pacific Desert-dwelling mantis <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Mantodea">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Guillén-Carpio</surname>
            <given-names>Juan Mateo</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4235-3829</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Rivera</surname>
            <given-names>Julio</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8497-3042</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Padrón Martínez</surname>
            <given-names>Pablo Sebastián</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">sebastianpadronm@yahoo.com</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9104-1657</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Laboratorio de Entomología, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador</addr-line>
        <institution>Laboratorio de Entomología, Universidad del Azuay</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Cuenca</addr-line>
        <country>Ecuador</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/037xrmj59</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Montreal Insectarium, Montreal, Canada</addr-line>
        <institution>Montreal Insectarium</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Montreal</addr-line>
        <country>Canada</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, INABIO, Quito, Ecuador</addr-line>
        <institution>Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, INABIO</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Quito</addr-line>
        <country>Ecuador</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/02veev176</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Pablo Sebastián Padrón Martínez (<email xlink:type="simple">sebastianpadronm@yahoo.com</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor:</p>
        </fn>
        <fn>
          <p>Matan Shelomi</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>11</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>35</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>299</fpage>
      <lpage>312</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/D575138D-C035-5497-9D23-0A52DFAEF268">D575138D-C035-5497-9D23-0A52DFAEF268</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/4B4303F9-FD9D-4973-A1F0-46BD5012DA82">4B4303F9-FD9D-4973-A1F0-46BD5012DA82</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>19</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Juan Mateo Guillén-Carpio, Julio Rivera, Pablo Sebastián Padrón Martínez</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/4B4303F9-FD9D-4973-A1F0-46BD5012DA82</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Knowledge of the natural history of Neotropical mantids remains limited, and detailed biological information is lacking for most species. Here, we provide the first comprehensive account of the biology, morphology, chromatic polymorphism, development, and potential distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> based primarily on material and observations from Ecuador, where the species inhabits arid ecosystems along the western slopes of the Andes. Our study reveals marked sexual differences in adult lifespan under laboratory conditions, with females living nearly twice as long as males, likely reflecting the energetic demands of ootheca production and prolonged foraging. We document key morphological traits and phenotypic variation relevant to the species’ ecology and taxonomy and present the first high-resolution photographic documentation of male and female genitalia for the species, including the first illustration of female genitalic structures. Coloration analyses show pronounced chromatic polymorphism in females and more uniform coloration in males. We propose that this polymorphism is associated with ecological and behavioral factors linked to crypsis in heterogeneous environments, particularly in apterous individuals (adult females and immatures) that rely heavily on substrate matching. A female with atypical green pigmentation recorded during the rainy season is consistent with developmental plasticity in coloration under seasonally variable conditions. Our ecological niche model indicates that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occupies arid and seasonally dry habitats from sea level to 2000 m a.s.l. between central Ecuador and northern Chile; although the model overpredicts suitable areas, precipitation seasonality emerged as the primary predictor of habitat suitability. Overall, this study provides the most complete dataset currently available for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Ecuador and establishes a foundation for future research on this species and other understudied Neotropical mantids.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>insect</kwd>
        <kwd>natural history</kwd>
        <kwd>neotropics</kwd>
        <kwd>phenotypic plasticity</kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Thespinae">Thespinae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Thespini">Thespini</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>Universidad del Azuay</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Guillén-Carpio JM, Rivera J, Padrón Martínez PS (2026) Integrative insights into the ecology, development, and chromatic polymorphism of the Pacific Desert-dwelling mantis <italic>Musonia margheritae</italic> (Mantodea, Thespidae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 35(2): 299–312. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/jor.35.185742" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.35.185742</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Although 498 mantid species have been recorded in the Neotropical region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Anderson 2025</xref>), the natural history of most taxa remains poorly documented or simply lacking. Sustained advances in Neotropical <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Mantodea">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> taxonomy and systematics over the last 25 years, together with more recent regional faunistic surveys (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lombardo and Agabiti 2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Rivera and Vergara-Cobián 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Schwarz et al. 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Moulin and Roy 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Trillo et al. 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Moulin et al. 2021</xref>), have reinvigorated interest in documenting the biology and behavior of praying mantises (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Rivera and Svenson 2020</xref>). As a result, natural history accounts are becoming increasingly common, typically incorporated as complementary narratives within taxonomic treatments or derived from structured and semi-structured observations of both wild and captive individuals (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ariza 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lanna et al. 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Schwarz and Glaw 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Scherrer and Aguiar 2022</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Castillo-Carrillo et al. 2022</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ferraz et al. 2025</xref>). The systematic documentation of such natural history data is essential for interpreting morphological diversity, informing evolutionary hypotheses, and contextualizing species-level adaptations within their ecological and behavioral frameworks.</p>
      <p>Within Neotropical <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Mantodea">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, the family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> stands out as the most diverse and ecologically diversified assemblage of microhabitat specialists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Rivera and Svenson 2016</xref>). Despite this diversity, the group has received comparatively little attention from researchers, even though it offers exceptional potential for uncovering biological and behavioral novelties (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rivera and Callohuari 2020</xref>). This limited attention can be partly attributable to their cryptic lifestyles and small body size, making individuals difficult to detect and study in the field, as well as challenging to maintain or breed under laboratory conditions. Although the general ecological preferences of major thespid lineages, such as their typical habitat associations and ecomorphological specializations, are reasonably well characterized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Rivera and Svenson 2020</xref>), the specific environmental and biological traits of most genera and species remain poorly documented, with existing studies concerning the ant-mimicking genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Mantillica">Mantillica</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Westwood, 1889 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Agudelo and Rafael 2014</xref>) and cryptic, substrate-masquerading <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudomiopteryx">Pseudomiopteryx</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Saussure, 1870 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Favacho and da Silva Carvalho-Filho 2023</xref>). Among the various thespid ecomorphs, lichen- and moss-mimicking taxa constitute a further exception in terms of biological knowledge, having received comparatively greater attention. Life-history studies of these forms have revealed striking, and in some cases unique, behavioral adaptations related to predation, including chromatic polyphenism and highly specialized prey-capture strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Rivera et al. 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Blanco and Salazar-E 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Falcón and Padrón 2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rivera and Callohuari 2020</xref>), underscoring both the evolutionary significance of microhabitat specialization in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and the substantial gaps that remain in our understanding of the group’s natural history.</p>
      <p>These gaps persist even for relatively widespread species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Battiston &amp; Picciau, 2008. A member of the tribe <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Thespini">Thespini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, this small and inconspicuously colored mantis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A, B</xref>) ranges from central Ecuador to northern Chile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Rivera and Svenson 2020</xref>), occupying arid to semiarid environments along the Pacific coast and the western slopes of the Andes, where it is relatively common. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> also persists in landscapes extensively modified by human activity, including agricultural areas, secondary vegetation, and urban environments. Across much of its distribution, it is effectively the only thespid species present and virtually the only praying mantis thriving in the harsh conditions characteristic of the Atacama–Sechura Desert system, one of the most extreme arid environments in South America.</p>
      <fig id="F1">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jor.35.185742.fig1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">5BFEFF98-36E1-544F-B0BC-6B085AE2AEC4</object-id>
        <label>Fig. 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p><bold>A</bold>. Female habitus of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; <bold>B</bold>. Male habitus of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; <bold>C</bold>. Habitat where most of the fieldwork was conducted in the locality of Yunguilla, Azuay Province (at the summit of the hill, the first author can be seen searching for specimens; <bold>D</bold>. Female <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in its natural habitat (red arrow) on the ground among herbaceous vegetation in the locality of Jubones, Azuay Province; <bold>E</bold>. Male <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> perching on a leaf at night in the locality of Churute, Guayas Province; <bold>F</bold>. Map showing records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Ecuador highlighting the localities of specimens dissected. Scale bars: 1 cm (<bold>A, B, F</bold>).</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="jor-35-299-g001.jpg" id="oo_1743943.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1743943</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>A distinctive attribute of the family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> is the chromatic variation exhibited by species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudopogonogaster">Pseudopogonogaster</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hebardi">hebardi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (see fig. 1 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Falcón and Padrón 2019</xref>). Chromatic polyphenism, in which a single genotype produces multiple color phenotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Nijhout 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Goldstein and Ehrenreich 2021</xref>), is among the most striking forms of phenotypic plasticity in insects and facilitates responses to spatially and temporally variable environments. By allowing individuals to track changes in substrate coloration or seasonal shifts, chromatic polyphenism can enhance camouflage efficiency, particularly in sedentary ambush predators such as mantises. Although chromatic polyphenism and background-dependent color change have been investigated in several Old World mantids, such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Mantis">Mantis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="religiosa">religiosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Linaeus, 1758, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Miomantis">Miomantis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caffra">caffra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Saussure, 1871, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Creobroter">Creobroter</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="gemmatus">gemmatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Stoll, 1813) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Battiston and Fontana 2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Burke and Holwell 2024</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Liu and Ma 2025</xref>), comparable documentation remains scarce for Neotropical taxa. In this region, chromatic polyphenism has only recently begun to receive attention, with documented cases including <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudopogonogaster">Pseudopogonogaster</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hebardi">hebardi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Metaphotina">Metaphotina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Falcón and Padrón 2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ferraz et al. 2025</xref>). Given its marked color variation, broad environmental tolerance, and accessibility in both natural and human-modified habitats, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> represents a suitable system for examining how chromatic variation is structured across ecological contexts.</p>
      <p>Accordingly, the objectives of this study are to (i) provide the first comprehensive natural history account of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, integrating novel ecological, behavioral, morphological, developmental, and distributional data, and (ii) document and analyze chromatic polyphenism in apterous females and juveniles using complementary observational and analytical approaches in order to examine how color variation relates to microhabitat use and environmental heterogeneity and to frame testable eco-evolutionary hypotheses regarding the role of camouflage and phenotypic plasticity in sedentary mantids inhabiting arid and seasonally variable environments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec3">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p><italic>Study area.—</italic>Fieldwork was conducted in southwestern Ecuador, specifically within the provinces of Azuay, El Oro, and Loja, from March 2022 to June 2023, across an elevational range of 10 to 250 m a.s.l. On a broader regional scale, western Ecuador and Peru encompass a mosaic of biomes, including tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests at higher elevations and on windward slopes, as well as tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests and deserts and xeric shrublands at lower elevations and in coastal areas, reflecting the pronounced environmental heterogeneity of the western Andean region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Olson et al. 2001</xref>).</p>
      <p>Behavioral observations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were carried out in the Yunguilla Valley (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">3.2853761°S, 79.2748317°W</named-content>; 1180 m a.s.l.) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1C</xref>) in Azuay Province. Vegetation in this region is classified as inter-Andean dry forest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aguirre et al. 2006</xref>) and is characterized by dominant plant species including <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Acacia">Acacia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macracantha">macracantha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd., 1806, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anadenanthera">Anadenanthera</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colubrina">colubrina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Vell.) Brenan. (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Fabaceae">Fabaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Echinopsis">Echinopsis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pachanoi">pachanoi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Britton &amp; Rose, 1920 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Cactaceae">Cactaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Dodonaea">Dodonaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="viscosa">viscosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Jacq., 1760 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Sapindaceae">Sapindaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cybistax">Cybistax</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="antisyphilitica">antisyphilitica</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Mart.) Mart., 1843 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Bignoniaceae">Bignoniaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aguirre et al. 2006</xref>).</p>
      <p>According to the global biome and ecoregion classification proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Olson et al. (2001)</xref>, the study area falls within the tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forest biome, which predominates in the inter-Andean valleys of southern Ecuador.</p>
      <p><italic>Specimen collection.—</italic>Specimens were collected manually during both diurnal and nocturnal surveys. Surveys were unstructured and opportunistic, and specimens were collected randomly while actively searching for individuals in the field. At each sampling locality, a fixed search effort of approximately two hours was allocated for specimen detection and collection, ensuring a comparable level of sampling effort among sites (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D, E</xref>; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>). Several specimens were preserved in 96% ethanol to ensure high-quality tissue preservation for future DNA analyses; these were later processed and deposited in the Zoological Museum of the Universidad del Azuay (<bold><named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Museo de Zoología de la Universidad del Azuay (MZUA)" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/5c476e90-e212-4b77-bfd0-40e84203f4cf">MZUA</named-content></bold>) in Cuenca, Ecuador. All collections were conducted under permit No. 208-2019-DPAA/MA issued by the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Ecological Transition of Ecuador.</p>
      <p><italic>Specimen data compilation.—</italic>We examined comparative material from the following institutions:</p>
      <p><bold><named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Museo de Zoología de la Universidad del Azuay (MZUA)" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/5c476e90-e212-4b77-bfd0-40e84203f4cf">MZUA</named-content></bold> Zoological Museum of the Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador.</p>
      <p><bold><named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Museo de Zoologia, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/1f33a2dd-ea62-4da3-b6f3-6fc19d259c99">QCAZ</named-content></bold> Zoological Museum of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.</p>
      <p><bold><abbrev content-type="institution" xlink:title="National Institute of Biodiversity, Quito, Ecuador">INABIO</abbrev></bold> National Institute of Biodiversity, Quito, Ecuador.</p>
      <p><bold><abbrev content-type="institution" xlink:title="Klaus Raven Büller Entomology Museum, National Agrarian University La Molina, Lima, Peru">MEKRB</abbrev></bold> Klaus Raven Büller Entomology Museum, National Agrarian University La Molina, Lima, Peru.</p>
      <p><bold><named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Academy of Natural Sciences" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/ad7d1a18-2ef8-4b2c-a302-5888fe9a2e1a">ANSP</named-content></bold> Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.</p>
      <p><bold><abbrev content-type="institution" xlink:title="Natural History Museum, National University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru">MUSM</abbrev></bold> Natural History Museum, National University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru.</p>
      <p><bold><named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="MNHN - Museum national d'Histoire naturelle" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/6a6ac6c5-1b8a-48db-91a2-f8661274ff80">MNHN</named-content></bold> Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.</p>
      <p>In addition, distributional records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Ecuador, Peru, and Chile were obtained from the citizen-science platform iNaturalist (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mason et al. 2025</xref>), compiled up to January 2024 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">iNaturalist 2024</xref>). Specimens deposited in <named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Museo de Zoología de la Universidad del Azuay (MZUA)" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/5c476e90-e212-4b77-bfd0-40e84203f4cf">MZUA</named-content> were photographed for subsequent morphological analyses (see Coloration Analysis section).</p>
      <p><italic>Developmental stages and rearing methods.—</italic>To document development from egg to adult, adult females were maintained in captivity to obtain oothecae and newly hatched nymphs. Juvenile specimens collected in the field were subsequently maintained and reared under controlled laboratory conditions until adulthood. All oothecae and immature stages were studied in the Entomology Laboratory of the Universidad del Azuay following the rearing procedures described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Falcón and Padrón (2019)</xref>. Individuals were reared separately in plastic containers under standardized laboratory conditions. For the first three developmental instars, containers measuring 10 cm in height and 5 cm in diameter were used, whereas individuals from the fourth instar onward and adults were housed in larger containers (14 cm in height and 10 cm in diameter). All rearing containers were placed on a metal shelving unit with sliding glass doors. Illumination was provided by an LED tube, and air circulation was ensured using computer fans to maintain fresh airflow and prevent excessive humidity condensation and overheating. Both lighting and ventilation systems were regulated using programmable timers to control on–off cycles.</p>
      <p>Feeding and hydration protocols were adjusted according to developmental stage. Mantises were fed three times per week; protonymphs were provided with fruit flies (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Drosophila">Drosophila</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp.), whereas deuteronymphs and adults were fed immature crickets reared under laboratory conditions. Water was supplied once per week by manual misting.</p>
      <p>Descriptions of post-embryonic development follow the semaphoront framework proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Scherrer and Aguiar (2022)</xref>, which is based on external morphological transitions during mantid ontogeny. Under this framework, mantid development is described using character-defined semaphoronts rather than instar number alone. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Scherrer and Aguiar (2022)</xref>, the prenymph refers to the short-lived emergent form preceding the protonymph, or first instar. The deuteronymph includes all subsequent nymphal instars and is further subdivided into mesonymphs, representing early deuteronymphs, and metanymphs, representing late deuteronymphs. Adult individuals are treated as the final post-nymphal semaphoront.</p>
      <p><italic>External morphological character measurements.—</italic>External morphological characters were measured for 29 males and 20 adult females. Character selection follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Brannoch et al. (2017)</xref>. The following structures were measured: Head, length and width, length and width of the frons. Body, total body length, measured from the vertex of the head to the tip of the abdomen (excluding cerci). Pronotum, total length (including prozone and metazone) and maximum width. Wings, length and maximum width of both forewings and hindwings. Prothoracic (fore) legs, length of the forecoxae; length and width of the forefemora; length of the foretibiae; total length of the foretarsi; measurements of the anterior limbs; length of antefemoral spines; length of anteroventral spines on the forefemur and foretibia; length of discoidal spines; and length of posteroventral spines on the forefemur and foretibia. Mesothoracic and metathoracic legs, length of the meso- and metathoracic coxae, femora, and tibiae, together with the total length of the tarsi. Raptorial forelegs, length of the forecoxa, forefemur, and foretibia, together with the total length of the tarsus.</p>
      <p>Measurements were recorded in millimeters. Mean and standard deviation (<abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>) were calculated using the mean function in R (base package). All measurements were obtained from high-resolution photographs of museum specimens captured with an Mshot MS60 camera mounted on a Nikon SMZ 745T stereomicroscope. A 1-cm scale bar included in each image was used to calibrate pixel-to-millimeter conversions in ImageJ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Rasband 1997–2018</xref>). In addition, the length and width of ten oothecae were measured using the same protocol.</p>
      <p><italic>Genitalia.—</italic>Ten males and one female from multiple localities across the known Ecuadorian distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1F</xref>), all deposited in the <named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Museo de Zoología de la Universidad del Azuay (MZUA)" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/5c476e90-e212-4b77-bfd0-40e84203f4cf">MZUA</named-content> collection, were dissected for genitalia study. Genitalia extraction followed the protocol of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Brannoch et al. (2017)</xref> with minor modifications. The terminal abdominal segments were removed and placed in test tubes containing hot 10% potassium hydroxide (<abbrev xlink:title="10% potassium hydroxide">KOH</abbrev>) for 12 minutes to clear soft tissues. The structures were then rinsed in distilled water and cleaned under a Nikon SMZ 745T stereomicroscope equipped with an Mshot MS60 camera. Following cleaning, the genitalia were transferred to 95% ethanol for two minutes and subsequently stored in glycerin-filled vials for detailed examination. Photographs were obtained using image stacking with a Canon 5D Mark III camera and microscope lenses at 10× magnification. Terminology used in genitalia descriptions follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Brannoch et al. (2017)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rivera and Callohuari (2020)</xref>.</p>
      <p><italic>Analysis of color variation.—</italic>To analyze color variation in adult <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, 20 males and 20 females from the <bold><named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Museo de Zoología de la Universidad del Azuay (MZUA)" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/5c476e90-e212-4b77-bfd0-40e84203f4cf">MZUA</named-content></bold> collection were photographed using a Canon 5D Mark III DSLR equipped with a Canon 100 mm macro lens. All photographs were taken under standardized lighting conditions against a white background to ensure consistency and comparability across specimens.</p>
      <p>To obtain quantitative color data and minimize subjectivity in identifying hues within the RGB system, the seven dominant hexadecimal (Hex) color codes were extracted from each image in descending order of frequency. Each Hex code consists of six alphanumeric characters, with each pair representing a color value ranging from 0 to 255 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lilley 2022</xref>).</p>
      <p>Dominant colors were extracted using the R packages magick, tidyverse, scales, and imager. Images were first resized to 500 px and reduced to 24 colors using the image_quantize function in the magick package. The resulting color palette for each specimen, including the corresponding Hex codes, was then plotted to visualize the full range of coloration present across individuals.</p>
      <p><italic>Potential distribution area of</italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name><italic>.—</italic>The potential distribution area of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was estimated for Ecuador, Peru, and Chile, the countries where the species has been recorded, using the Maximum Entropy algorithm (Maxent; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Phillips et al. 2006</xref>). Georeferenced occurrence records were compiled from three sources: (i) field-collected specimens, (ii) museum collections, and (iii) validated iNaturalist observations. All coordinates were carefully inspected and corrected for potential georeferencing errors using QGIS (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>), and records lacking geographic coordinates were excluded. The final dataset was standardized in decimal degrees (WGS84) and used as input for ecological niche modeling.</p>
      <fig id="F2">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jor.35.185742.fig2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">D975221D-77B7-5F92-AD1F-0517BF29BDE7</object-id>
        <label>Fig. 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p><bold>A</bold>. Potential distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in South America based on the best-supported Maxent model using precipitation-related variables (BIO12–BIO19). <bold>B</bold>. Elevation–latitude relationship in suitable areas, showing a non-linear pattern with highest elevations near the Equator and a decline toward higher southern latitudes, as supported by a generalized additive model (<abbrev xlink:title="generalized additive model">GAM</abbrev>). Points are colored according to elevation, and shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="jor-35-299-g002.jpg" id="oo_1743944.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1743944</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>Environmental predictors consisted of 19 bioclimatic variables (BIO1–BIO19) obtained from the CHELSA climate database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">CHELSA Climate 2022</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). All raster layers were provided in GeoTIFF format and resampled to a common spatial resolution and extent. To restrict model projections to ecologically relevant regions, environmental layers were clipped to the study area encompassing Ecuador, Peru, and Chile.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Bioclimatic variables obtained from the CHELSA platform and used to estimate the potential distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Ecuador. Variables in bold indicate those considered most important in the selected model.<bold/></p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Variable code</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Variable description</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean annual temperature [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean diurnal range [°C]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Isothermality</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio4</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Temperature seasonality (standard deviation)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio5</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Maximum temperature of the warmest month [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio6</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Minimum temperature of the coldest month [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio7</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Annual temperature range [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio8</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean temperature of the wettest quarter [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio9</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean temperature of the driest quarter [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio10</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean temperature of the warmest quarter [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bio11</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean temperature of the coldest quarter [°C*10]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio12</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Annual precipitation [mm/year]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio13</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Precipitation of the wettest month [mm/month]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio14</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Precipitation of the driest month [mm/month]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio15</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio16</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Precipitation of the wettest quarter [mm/quarter]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio17</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Precipitation of the driest quarter [mm/quarter]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio18</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Precipitation of the warmest quarter [mm/quarter]</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Bio19</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Precipitation of the coldest quarter [mm/quarter]</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>To reduce multicollinearity among environmental predictors, environmental values were randomly sampled across the study area and evaluated using variance inflation factors (<abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factors">VIF</abbrev>). Variables with <abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factors">VIF</abbrev> values greater than 10 were excluded prior to model calibration.</p>
      <p>Model selection followed the Akaike Information Criterion (<abbrev xlink:title="Akaike Information Criterion">AIC</abbrev>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Akaike 1974</xref>), with the parameterization showing the lowest <abbrev xlink:title="Akaike Information Criterion">AIC</abbrev> value selected as the best-supported model. The resulting continuous suitability raster was exported and projected in QGIS for visualization and further spatial analyses.</p>
      <p>Post-model analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between elevation distribution range and latitude. The relationship between elevation and latitude was explored using scatter plots. Given the expected non-linear response, a generalized additive model (<abbrev xlink:title="generalized additive model">GAM</abbrev>) was fitted to assess and visualize altitudinal trends along the latitudinal gradient. Elevation was modeled as a smooth function of absolute latitude, allowing flexible estimation of non-linear patterns. A vertical reference line at 0° latitude was included in the graphical outputs to indicate the equatorial region.</p>
      <p>All statistical analyses and visualizations were performed in R using the ggplot2 package to generate publication-quality figures. Spatial analyses and map visualizations were conducted using R and QGIS.</p>
      <p><italic>Statistical analyses.—</italic>Morphological character measurements were summarized using measures of central tendency, specifically the mean and standard deviation (<abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>). All calculations were performed in R using the mean function from the base package and the <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev> function from the stats package.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec4">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p><italic>Habitat in Ecuador.—</italic>Information from 228 specimens of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was examined, including museum material, field-collected individuals, literature records, and specimens reared in captivity. These records originate from multiple localities in Ecuador, Peru, and Chile. Within Ecuador, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is distributed in Azuay, Cañar, Guayas, El Oro, Esmeraldas, Loja, Santa Elena, Los Ríos, and Manabí provinces, confirming its broad distribution across the western slopes of the Andes and adjacent lowland regions.</p>
      <p>Field observations revealed clear differences in habitat use among life stages and between sexes. Females and immature individuals were predominantly found on the ground, sheltered among herbaceous vegetation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D</xref>). In contrast, males were mainly encountered in the shrub layer or near artificial light sources during early morning hours or at night (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1E</xref>), suggesting greater mobility and a tendency to occupy higher vegetation strata. Individuals were observed at various times of day, indicating that activity is not restricted to a narrow diurnal window.</p>
      <p><italic>Potential distribution area of</italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name><italic>.—</italic>Ecological niche modeling was conducted using 228 georeferenced occurrence records (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>). The Maxent model predicted areas of high environmental suitability for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> primarily along the Andean region of Ecuador and Peru, with suitability progressively declining toward southern latitudes in Chile (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>). Model selection based on the Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size (<abbrev xlink:title="Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size">AICc</abbrev>) identified the best-supported model (<abbrev xlink:title="Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size">AICc</abbrev> = 1051.04), which included eight precipitation-related variables (BIO12–BIO19). Variable importance analyses indicated that annual precipitation (BIO12) was the most influential predictor, contributing 45% to the model, followed by other precipitation-related variables. Jackknife tests further corroborated these results, showing that precipitation variables contained the highest amount of unique information, as their exclusion resulted in the greatest reduction in model gain, underscoring the dominant role of precipitation regimes in shaping the species’ environmental niche (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
      <p>The resulting potential distribution map revealed a pronounced concentration of suitable habitat along the western slopes of the Andes, encompassing the Ecuadorian provinces of Azuay, Cañar, Guayas, El Oro, Esmeraldas, Loja, Santa Elena, Los Ríos, and Manabí (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>). Additional areas of predicted suitability were identified in northern Ecuador, along the eastern slopes of the Andes in Peru, and within adjacent coastal river valleys. Overall, the elevational range of environmentally suitable habitat extends from sea level to approximately 2,000 m.</p>
      <p>To further examine how geographic variation influences the species’ realized niche, the altitudinal structure of predicted suitable areas was analyzed along a latitudinal gradient. Elevation was not included as a predictor in the species distribution model; instead, it was extracted post hoc from a digital elevation model to characterize elevational patterns associated with environmentally suitable conditions. When considering only areas with suitability values greater than 20%, the potential distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> exhibited a broad altitudinal envelope near equatorial latitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>). Toward southern latitudes, both minimum and maximum elevations progressively declined, resulting in a marked contraction of the altitudinal range. This pattern indicates a latitudinal restriction of suitable elevational conditions toward the southern portion of the species’ distribution.</p>
      <p>Elevation varied substantially across the examined latitudinal gradient, with the highest elevations concentrated near the Equator. Visual inspection of the scatter plot revealed a clear non-linear relationship between elevation and latitude, characterized by higher elevational values at low latitudes and a progressive decline toward higher southern latitudes. This pattern was further supported by the <abbrev xlink:title="generalized additive model">GAM</abbrev>, which detected a significant latitudinal effect. The smooth term displayed a pronounced non-linear shape, with a distinct peak in elevation near 0° latitude, followed by a marked decrease with increasing distance from the Equator. Confidence intervals around the smooth term were generally narrow across most of the latitudinal range, indicating high confidence in the estimated relationship (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>). Collectively, these results suggest that the probability of occurrence at higher elevations increases toward equatorial regions and decreases toward higher latitudes, reflecting an altitudinal optimum associated with intermediate climatic conditions.</p>
      <p><italic>Development.—</italic>A total of 31 individuals were successfully reared to adulthood, originating from both captive-produced oothecae and juveniles collected in the field. The development of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, consistent with the semaphoront-based framework proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Scherrer and Aguiar (2022)</xref>, is described below and illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>.</p>
      <fig id="F3">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jor.35.185742.fig3</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">3D3F0427-6E29-54D0-B73D-9EF410D61F59</object-id>
        <label>Fig. 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Development of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. Four semaphoronts of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (not to scale); <bold>B</bold>. Key morphological changes: Protonymph: simple, weakly sclerotized forefemoral spines; genital segments visible but without sexual differentiation; small wing pads in males. Deuteronymph: increased spine sclerotization with a distinct discoidal spine; enlarged genital segments with early sex-related traits in some individuals; larger wing pads, especially in males. Adult: definitive forefemoral spines; fully differentiated genital segments; fully developed wings in males.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="jor-35-299-g003.jpg" id="oo_1743945.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1743945</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p><italic>Ootheca.—</italic>The ootheca (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>) is deposited on low vegetation, typically among grasses, at heights below one meter. Attachment to the substrate occurs through a continuous layer of covering secretion that coats the entire structure, giving the surface a velvety, smooth texture; once removed, it exposes the pale, orangish-brown coloration of the external wall. The ootheca is compact, subrectangular, and slightly laterally compressed. It bears a short, filiform residual process directed upward and/or forward. The external wall distinctly reveals the individual egg chambers, which are prominently raised; each ootheca contains between 10 and 23 such chambers. The emergence area is located dorsally and consists of 10 to 17 exit openings. The lateral and transverse walls of these openings are elevated, with the transverse walls gradually decreasing in height toward the center, forming a shallow median groove. In the lateral view, the dorsal margin appears dentate or slightly serrated, with a subtle distal orientation.</p>
      <p>Adult females produced between one and four oothecae, with size variation among successive depositions. Intervals between depositions ranged from one to two weeks and were influenced by food availability. Larger oothecae yielded more hatchlings, indicating a positive correlation between ootheca size and offspring number. Under laboratory conditions, development from ootheca deposition to hatching lasted 43–48 days (mean = 45 days; n = 3). Depending on size and deposition sequence, each ootheca produced between 15 and 35 hatchlings. In the Peruvian coast, wild egg cases are attacked by the chalcidoid microwasps <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Podagrion">Podagrion</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="brasiliense">brasiliense</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Torymidae">Torymidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Podagrionini">Podagrionini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Rivera 2003</xref>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anastatus">Anastatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Eupelmidae">Eupelmidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) (J. Rivera pers. obs.).</p>
      <p><italic>Protonymph (first instar).—</italic>The protonymph (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A, B</xref>) stage lasted 38 days. Protonymphs exhibit a distinctive morphology that sets them apart from later instars, including strongly contrasting banded patterns on all legs and reduced, weakly sclerotized spines on the forefemur and foretibia. Male wing pads were not externally evident at this stage. Genital segments are visible in the abdominal region but show no external sexual differentiation. Protonymphs have been observed to rely heavily on crypsis, using coloration and body ornamentation to remain inconspicuous, and they typically remain motionless for extended periods to avoid predation.</p>
      <p><italic>Deuteronymph (mesonymph and metanymph stages).—</italic>The combined duration of the deuteronymph (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A, B</xref>) phase was 109 days. Although a few individuals reached the second instar, observations were limited due to high mortality, preventing adequate documentation of this stage. The mesonymph stage (third instar) lasted 27 days, during which individuals developed more pronounced foreleg spines and increased sclerotization, particularly on the proximal discoidal spine. Male wing pads expanded slightly relative to the protonymph stage. Genital segments became more evident but still lacked reliable sexual differentiation. Crypsis continued to be important, with individuals maintaining coloration and ornamentation that allowed them to blend with dry substrates.</p>
      <p>The metanymph stage comprised the fourth and fifth instars, which lasted 33 and 49 days, respectively. During these instars, morphology became more robust and diagnostic. Foreleg spination became strongly sclerotized, and male wing pads increased substantially in size, indicating imminent development of functional wings. Genital segmentation grew increasingly prominent, and some individuals showed early external cues of sexual differentiation. Body ornamentation persisted and appeared more elaborate, enhancing camouflage within the typical dry and heterogeneous substrates of the species’ habitat.</p>
      <p><italic>Adult.—</italic>Adults of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A, B</xref>) show fully developed morphological structures characteristic of the species, with the foreleg spines reaching their complete form, including the sharply defined and fully sclerotized proximal discoidal spine. In males, the wings are fully formed and functional, supporting active dispersal. Genital structures are entirely differentiated and permit straightforward sex identification. The cryptic coloration and surface textures characteristic of earlier instars persist into adulthood, facilitating camouflage among leaf litter, dry soil, and vegetation. Adult longevity differed markedly between sexes. Females lived approximately two to three months under laboratory conditions, whereas males survived 30–38 days. As with all mantids, adults do not molt further, and the molt lines prominent in immature stages are absent.</p>
      <p><italic>Measurements of morphological characters.—</italic>Measurements of morphological characters of males, females, and oothecae are detailed in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Morphological measurements of males and females (mm).</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="2" colspan="1"/>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Body length</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Head width</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Length of metathoracic legs</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Forefemur length</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Pronotum length</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Mean</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>
                  <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>
                </bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Mean</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>
                  <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>
                </bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Mean</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>
                  <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>
                </bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Mean</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>
                  <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>
                </bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Mean</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>
                  <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>
                </bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Male (n = 29)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25.4</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.6</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">23</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.9</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Female (n = 20)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25.8</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.8</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.8</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.71</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.7</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.9</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.45</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Morphological measurements of the oothecae (mm).<bold/></p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="2" colspan="1"/>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Length</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Width</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Mean</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>
                  <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>
                </bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Mean</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>
                  <abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>
                </bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Oothecae (n = 10)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.8</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.17</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.08</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.42</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p><italic>Genitalia description.—</italic>The configuration of the male genitalia is characteristic of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Rivera and Svenson 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Schwarz and Roy 2019</xref>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). The species is distinguished by the shape of the distal margin of the left phallomere, which bears two dll (one rounded and the other truncated) that are divergent and separated by a moderately deep, rounded gap. Within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the relative size, position, and shape of these lobes constitute informative characters for species delimitation. The left phallomere has a curved and pointed afa, which is accompanied by a large loa. The ventral phallomere with a strongly sclerotized, almond-shaped region that is prominently visible distally along its left margin (part of the pda).</p>
      <fig id="F4">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jor.35.185742.fig4</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">443636AA-E49B-5E6D-BA60-823FCEF1F38C</object-id>
        <label>Fig. 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Adult genitalia of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. Male: Pp, Posterior process; Lpp, Main posterior lobe; Pa, Apical process; Af, Phalloid apophysis; Lm, Membranous lobe; <bold>B</bold>. Female: Ca, Caudogynium; Bs, Spermathecal bulge; Lsga, Supporting lobe of the accessory gland; Gon9, Gonoplac 9; G8, Gonapophysis 8; G9, Gonapophysis 9; Lag, Apical lobe of the gonapophysis; image not to scale. Scale bar: 1 mm (<bold>A</bold>).</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="jor-35-299-g004.jpg" id="oo_1743946.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1743946</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>In females, the CG8 sclerite is large and exhibits irregular anterior and posterior margins. The posterior margin bears three triangular lobes of similar size, with the median lobe slightly shorter, whereas the anterior margin presents a prominent median triangular lobe flanked by two narrower and slightly curved lobes. The CX8 sclerites are narrow and weakly sclerotized and are only loosely articulated with the CG8 sclerite. The ovipositor is relatively elongated.</p>
      <p><italic>Coloration and chromatic polyphenism.—</italic>Seven dominant Hex colors were obtained from 40 adults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). The first color corresponded to the white background on which the specimens were photographed; therefore, it was removed, and the analysis considered the Hex codes starting from the second extracted color (a total of six colors), with the first being the most dominant. The color codes for each analyzed individual are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>. A clear dominance of light to dark brown tones (#A18262) is evident. Greater variability in coloration patterns is also noticeable in females compared to males, resulting in pronounced chromatic polyphenism (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B</xref>).</p>
      <fig id="F5">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jor.35.185742.fig5</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">D6BDFDC8-2785-5932-BA43-0D4BECF6F88C</object-id>
        <label>Fig. 5.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Sexual chromatic polyphenism in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. Six dominant colors identified from 20 males, with corresponding hex codes. Each column (museum code) represents an individual; <bold>B</bold>. Six dominant colors identified from 20 females, with corresponding hex codes. Each column (museum code) represents an individual; <bold>C</bold>. A female exhibiting an atypical green coloration, recorded during the rainy season.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="jor-35-299-g005.jpg" id="oo_1743947.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1743947</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>In addition to the primary chromatic patterns, we recorded a female exhibiting an atypical green coloration during the rainy season (April–July). This individual was collected on April 4, 2023. Brown-colored females were also collected during the same rainy period, indicating that both chromatic morphs occur concurrently during this season (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref>). This rare phenotype stands out from the brown-dominated color spectrum and suggests that pigmentation may exhibit environmentally induced plasticity. The occurrence of this green morph specifically during periods of increased humidity and vegetation cover raises the possibility that such coloration provides adaptive benefits through enhanced crypsis in greener microhabitats. Although based on a single observation, this finding highlights the potential role of seasonal cues in modulating developmental pathways related to coloration in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and underscores the complexity of chromatic variation within the species.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec5">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>This study presents the first integrative natural history account of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, bringing together ecological observations, developmental data, morphological analyses, chromatic characterization, and ecological niche modeling. The results document pronounced variation across life stages, sexes, habitats, and geographic contexts, revealing a species that combines broad environmental tolerance with fine-scale phenotypic and ecological structuring. Rather than providing direct tests of adaptive mechanisms, the patterns described here offer an opportunity to explore how life-history traits, mobility, habitat use, and environmental heterogeneity may interact to shape phenotypic variation in a widespread Neotropical thespid.</p>
      <p>In the sections that follow, we examine these patterns in the context of climate, development, morphology, and coloration and consider their potential ecological and evolutionary implications.</p>
      <p><italic>Potential distribution area of</italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name><italic>.—</italic>Ecological niche modeling based on 228 georeferenced occurrence records revealed a pronounced concentration of suitable habitat along the western Andean slopes of Ecuador and Peru, with suitability progressively declining toward southern latitudes in Chile. In Ecuador, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inhabits arid to semiarid environments along the western slopes of the Andes, occurring primarily in coastal ecosystems near the Pacific Ocean and in inter-Andean valleys. Its elevational range extends from sea level to approximately 2000 m, as inferred from the altitudinal envelope of areas exhibiting environmental suitability values greater than 20%. These environments largely correspond to coastal dry shrubland, coastal deciduous forest, and western montane forest ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Ron 2020</xref>).</p>
      <p>Beyond Ecuador, the model predicts extensive suitable habitat along much of the Peruvian coast, particularly in Tumbes and the interior of Piura, with a more or less continuous band south of Piura up to Ica and becoming increasingly fragmented southward toward Tacna. Additional areas of predicted suitability were identified along the eastern slopes of the Andes in Peru and within lower coastal valleys, underscoring the role of Andean topography in structuring the species’ potential distribution.</p>
      <p>The model identified climatically suitable areas in the northern inter-Andean valleys of Guayllabamba (Pichincha) and Chota (Imbabura), as well as near Zumba in southern Ecuador (Zamora Chinchipe). However, despite intensive sampling efforts, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has not been recorded in these regions. Conversely, the model failed to predict suitable habitat in northern Chile, where the species has been recently confirmed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Rivera and Svenson 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De La Fuente 2023</xref>).</p>
      <p>Discrepancies between predicted and observed distributions may reflect overprediction, a well-recognized limitation of presence-only ecological niche models, which infer species–environment relationships based on statistical correlations rather than mechanistic constraints (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Phillips et al. 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Shcheglovitova and Anderson 2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Radosavljevic and Anderson 2014</xref>). Alternatively, environmentally suitable but unoccupied areas may arise from dispersal limitations, historical or geographic barriers, or biotic interactions, all of which can constrain species ranges independently of climatic suitability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Holt 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Godsoe and Harmon 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lomolino et al. 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Giannini et al. 2013</xref>).</p>
      <p>Among the climatic predictors, precipitation-related variables dominated the best-supported model, which included eight precipitation variables (BIO12–BIO19) and was selected based on the <abbrev xlink:title="Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size">AICc</abbrev>. Annual precipitation (BIO12) was the most influential predictor, contributing 45% to the model. Jackknife analyses further confirmed the dominant role of precipitation, as the exclusion of these variables resulted in the greatest reduction in model gain, indicating that they contained the highest amount of unique information. This pattern is consistent with the environmental conditions characterizing the known distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which is associated with warm temperatures, low annual rainfall, and vegetation dominated by herbaceous and xerophytic plant communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador 2012</xref>). Notably, much of the species’ predicted distribution within Ecuador overlaps the Tumbesian region, a recognized biodiversity hotspot with high levels of endemism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Cuesta et al. 2017</xref>) that is currently experiencing severe deforestation, habitat fragmentation, and conversion to agricultural and urban land uses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mosandl et al. 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Rivas et al. 2021</xref>). Although <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> appears to be relatively widespread and capable of persisting in modified landscapes, the overlap between its suitable habitat and rapidly transformed dry-forest ecosystems suggests that future conservation assessments should evaluate population connectivity, habitat loss, and regional trends before a formal IUCN category can be proposed.</p>
      <p>On a broader geographic scale, the predicted distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> reflects a strong association with climatically stable environments typical of Andean and sub-Andean regions. The overwhelming importance of precipitation variables suggests that moisture availability, rather than temperature alone, plays a central role in defining the species’ environmental niche, a pattern consistent with other Neotropical mantids and insects associated with seasonally dry ecosystems. The observed decline in habitat suitability toward southern latitudes likely reflects increasing climatic seasonality and decreasing mean temperatures, which may exceed the species’ physiological tolerances. These results highlight the importance of montane environments as potential climatic refugia, particularly under future climate change scenarios.</p>
      <p>The elevational patterns observed across the species’ latitudinal range further support this interpretation. Although elevation was not included as a predictor in the species distribution model, it was extracted post hoc from a digital elevation model to characterize altitudinal trends associated with climatically suitable areas. When considering only areas with suitability values exceeding 20%, the potential distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> exhibited a broad altitudinal envelope near equatorial latitudes that progressively contracted toward the south. Elevation varied substantially across the examined latitudinal gradient, with the highest elevations concentrated near the Equator.</p>
      <p>Visual inspection of the scatter plot revealed a clear non-linear relationship between elevation and latitude, characterized by higher elevations at low latitudes and a progressive decline toward higher southern latitudes. This pattern was statistically supported by a <abbrev xlink:title="generalized additive model">GAM</abbrev>, which detected a significant latitudinal effect. The fitted smooth term displayed a pronounced peak in elevation near 0° latitude, followed by a marked decrease with increasing distance from the Equator. Confidence intervals around the smooth term were generally narrow across most of the latitudinal range, indicating high confidence in the estimated relationship. Collectively, these results suggest that the probability of occurrence at higher elevations increases toward equatorial regions and decreases toward higher latitudes, reflecting an altitudinal optimum associated with intermediate climatic conditions.</p>
      <p>Although the analysis is based on occurrence data that may be affected by sampling bias, the consistency of these patterns indicates a robust biogeographic signal. Future studies integrating fine-scale climatic data, physiological tolerance experiments, and demographic or dispersal analyses would be valuable for elucidating the mechanisms underlying the observed altitudinal and latitudinal gradients in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
      <p><italic>Developmental stages.—</italic>Under laboratory conditions, adult females lived, on average, twice as long as males. This difference is likely associated with the higher energetic demands of ootheca production, as suggested by our rearing observations: Both the size and number of oothecae depend on food availability, which ultimately influences the number of nymphs produced. In contrast, males exhibited shorter lifespans, likely reflecting their primary role in mate searching and reproduction. Similar sex-biased longevity patterns have been reported in species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Stagmomantis">Stagmomantis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Choeradodis">Choeradodis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Maxwell 1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lücking et al. 2010</xref>). The dataset presented here represents the most comprehensive biological information currently available for any mantis species recorded in Ecuador and constitutes the first detailed account for the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
      <p><italic>Genitalia.—</italic>Our analysis of male genital structures showed that they are consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Battiston and Picciau (2008)</xref>, making species identification straightforward. Female genitalia, on the other hand, has not been documented for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, female genitalia are known for only three species: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudomiopteryx">Pseudomiopteryx</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guyanensis">guyanensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Chopard, 1911, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudomiopteryx">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="spinifrons">spinifrons</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Saussure, 1870 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Pseudomiopteryginae">Pseudomiopteryginae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Favacho and da Silva Carvalho-Filho 2023</xref>), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Thesprotiella">Thesprotiella</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="simpira">simpira</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rivera and Callohuari 2020</xref>) (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Thespinae">Thespinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rivera and Callohuari 2020</xref>). In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the presence of a large CG8 loosely articulated to narrow, elongated CX8 sclerites mirrors the condition observed in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Thesprotiella">T.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="simpira">simpira</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and contrasts sharply with that of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudomiopteryx">Pseudomiopteryx</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp., in which the CG8 sclerite is broadly connected to equally broad, prominent, and heavily sclerotized and texturized CX8. The ovipositor is relatively elongated, like <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Thesprotiella">T.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="simpira">simpira</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, contrasting with the relatively shorter and stockier ovipositor of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudomiopteryx">Pseudomiopteryx</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp.</p>
      <p>Our observations suggest that structural features of the CG8 (caudogyne) and CX8 (coxa 8) sclerites may constitute an informative character system for distinguishing <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Pseudomiopteryginae">Pseudomiopteryginae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> from at least some representatives of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Thespinae">Thespinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. At present, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> classification relies primarily on male genital morphology for subfamily-level diagnosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Schwarz and Roy 2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Rivera and Svenson 2020</xref>), and no character systems derived from female genitalia have yet been identified that independently support subfamily delimitation within the family. The patterns observed here suggest that female genitalic morphology may represent such an overlooked source of diagnostic characters; however, broader comparative sampling across <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> will be necessary to evaluate the consistency and taxonomic utility of this character system.</p>
      <p><italic>Coloration.—</italic>With respect to coloration, males exhibited greater uniformity, whereas females displayed marked variability, demonstrating a pronounced chromatic polymorphism. A similar phenomenon has been reported in females of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudopogonogaster">Pseudopogonogaster</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hebardi">hebardi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Terra, 1982 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Falcón and Padrón 2019</xref>). Such phenotypic plasticity is likely to be an adaptation to enhance crypsis in heterogeneous environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Noor et al. 2008</xref>) and may be shaped and maintained by natural selection, particularly predation pressure from birds and reptiles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Simpson et al. 2011</xref>).</p>
      <p>The apterism of the female likely plays a central role in the evolution of this polymorphism. Unlike males, who possess functional wings and can escape by flight, as observed in other Neotropical mantids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Crane 1952</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Robinson 1969</xref>), females rely primarily on crypsis for predator avoidance. Reproductive demands may also contribute: Ootheca production requires high energetic investment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Matsura and Morooka 1983</xref>), forcing females to forage for longer periods and increasing predation risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Balakrishnan 2012</xref>). Their longer lifespan further elevates cumulative exposure to predators. Additionally, the heterogeneous substrates these mantises inhabit do not favor uniform coloration. Because males typically occupy higher vegetation strata and disperse more effectively, they can move among substrates that better match their existing coloration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Edmunds 1972</xref>). This, in addition to their capacity to evade predators by flight, likely reduces selective pressure for the evolution of multipurpose color patterns in this sex.</p>
      <p>Many mantis species are generalist predators capable of occupying diverse habitats; however, their sit-and-wait hunting strategy reduces mobility, especially for males, during flightless developmental stages. Limited motility may confine individuals to small home ranges and strengthen attachment to natal habitats. Such environmental consistency may facilitate the evolution of developmental plasticity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Burke and Holwell 2024</xref>).</p>
      <p>In addition to the predominant brown chromatic patterns, we documented a female exhibiting atypical green coloration during the rainy season. This rare phenotype stands apart from the typical color spectrum of the species and suggests that pigmentation in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> may be influenced by environmentally induced plasticity. Its occurrence coincides with periods of increased precipitation, humidity, and seasonal vegetation greening, conditions that characterize the northern portion of the species’ distribution in Ecuador and northern Peru. Comparable environmentally associated chromatic variation has been reported in other species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Mantis">Mantis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="religiosa">religiosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Linnaeus, 1758 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Mantidae">Mantidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), where green morphs are more frequently observed under conditions of increased humidity and vegetation cover (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Battiston and Fontana 2010</xref>), supporting the interpretation that color expression in mantids may be modulated by multiple environmental factors rather than by substrate alone. In these otherwise arid environments, vegetation responds rapidly and recurrently to annual rainy seasons, potentially favoring the expression and maintenance of green chromatic morphs. In contrast, more southerly regions of Peru experience more persistent aridity, with increased rainfall largely restricted to exceptional events such as El Niño, which may limit the occurrence of such phenotypes. This pattern suggests that green coloration may be structured along precipitation gradients and ecoregional transitions within the Tumbesian region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Olson et al. 2001</xref>), where greener morphs are associated with areas of higher seasonal vegetation cover. Although based on a limited number of observations, including records from citizen science platforms such as iNaturalist (<ext-link xlink:href="https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/192224510" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/192224510</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/173877095" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/173877095</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/62968599" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/62968599</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/260758293" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/260758293</ext-link>), the presence of green females in Ecuador and northern Peru, coupled with their absence in more arid southern localities, supports the hypothesis that this coloration confers adaptive advantages through enhanced crypsis in greener microhabitats. Similar green morphs reported in other <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (e.g., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="surinama">surinama</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="remota">remota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) further suggest that this chromatic variant may represent a conserved, environmentally responsive strategy within the genus rather than an anomalous trait.</p>
      <p>We therefore propose that these ecological and behavioral factors collectively contribute to the expression and persistence of chromatic polymorphism in females of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, consistent with its role as a key defensive strategy in apterous life stages. This interpretation is further consistent with the coloration variability observed in immature stages (not reported here but noted during rearing), which also lack wings and are likely to rely heavily on crypsis.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusion" id="sec6">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>This study provides the first comprehensive natural history account of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, integrating ecological observations, developmental data, coloration analyses, morphological measurements, genitalia documentation, and species distribution modeling. Our observations reveal that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is a remarkably adaptable thespid, capable of thriving across a broad environmental gradient, from hyper-arid coastal scrub to seasonally dry inter-Andean valleys, and persisting in landscapes heavily modified by human activities. The reconstructed developmental sequence, based on controlled rearing and field-collected juveniles, clarifies the morphology and duration of each semaphoront, offering a robust framework for comparative ontogenetic studies within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Furthermore, the detailed characterization of chromatic polyphenism in apterous females and juveniles highlights its central role in crypsis within structurally heterogeneous habitats, consistent with a scenario in which limited mobility and prolonged exposure to variable substrates favor plastic, rather than fixed, coloration strategies in apterous life stages, underscoring the potential of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as a model system for investigating phenotypic plasticity in Neotropical mantises.</p>
      <p>Our results also expand the taxonomic and morphological foundations for the species. The high-resolution documentation of male and female genitalia, illustrated here for the first time, reveals structural attributes of potential diagnostic and taxonomic value, suggesting that female genital characters may represent an underexplored source of phylogenetic signal within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, complementing current efforts to evaluate the systematic relevance of female genital morphology within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. In parallel, the species distribution model, driven primarily by precipitation-related variables, delineates the environmental parameters shaping the range of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and predicts areas of suitable habitat that may currently be occupied or remain uncolonized due to historical, biogeographic, or dispersal constraints, indicating that climatic suitability alone may not fully determine the realized distribution of the species.</p>
      <p>Collectively, this work establishes a much-needed baseline for understanding the ecological breadth, life-history strategies, and phenotypic diversity of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and for exploring how these dimensions interact within an ecological framework while also opening new avenues for future research. Further studies should examine the species’ feeding preferences under natural conditions and its functional role within the ecosystems it inhabits. Additionally, the chromatic polymorphism documented here provides a foundation for experimental approaches, including controlled laboratory studies aimed at elucidating the physiological and genetic mechanisms underlying color variation. Together, these perspectives position <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as a valuable focal species for broader investigations into the evolution, systematics, and diversification of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Thespidae">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in the Neotropics.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>We thank the Universidad del Azuay for supporting this project through its research program (2022-0056). The first author thanks his parents and family for their support during the development of this research. Finally, we thank the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Ecological Transition of Azuay for issuing the research permit 208-2019-DPAA/MA. We are also grateful to the curators and staff of the museums and scientific collections who kindly granted access to their specimens and facilities, which were essential for the development of this study.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Agudelo AA, Rafael JA (2014) Género <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Mantillica</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Westwood, 1889: redescubrimiento y revisión de la mantis amazónica (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Oligonicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Entomological Science 17: 400–408. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ens.12072" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12072</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Aguirre ZM, Kvist LP, Sánchez OT (2006) Bosques secos en Ecuador y su diversidad, Botánica Económica de los Andes <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Centrales</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. In: Moraes M, Øllgaard B, Kvist LP, Borchsenius F, Balslev H (Eds) Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia, 162–187.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716–723. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Anderson K (2025) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Mundi: Comprehensive nomenclatural catalogue of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (December 2025 edition). <ext-link xlink:href="10.13140/RG.2.2.32817.44647" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32817.44647</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Ariza GM (2011) Descripción de la hembra y ciclo de vida de <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Stagmomantis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">parvidentata</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies">colombiana</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Ariza, Salazar, 2005 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Mantidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Boletín Científico. Centro de Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 15: 213–223.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Balakrishnan P (2012) Ambush and oviposition site selection by giant Asian mantis <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Hierodula</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">membranacea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Burmeister (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Mantidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in tropical wet evergreen forests, Western Ghats, India. The Journal of Tropical Asian Entomology 1: 13–19.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Battiston R, Picciau L (2008) First report of the praying mantis genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Musoniella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Giglio-Tos, 1916 from Ecuador with the description of a new species (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Thespinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Biodiversity of South America, I. Memoirs on Biodiversity 1: 31–38.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Battiston R, Fontana P (2010) Colour change and habitat preferences in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Mantis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">religiosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Bulletin of Insectology 63: 85–89.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Blanco O, Salazar-E JA (2015) Rediscovery of the poorly known lichen-mantis <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pogonogaster</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">tristani</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rehn, 1918 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Oligonicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Costa Rica and ecological notes. Boletín Científico. Centro de Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 19: 193–202. <ext-link xlink:href="10.17151/bccm.2015.19.1.13" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2015.19.1.13</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Brannoch SK, Wieland F, Rivera J, Klass KD, Béthoux O, Svenson GJ (2017) Manual of praying mantis morphology, nomenclature, and practices (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). ZooKeys 696: 1–100. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/zookeys.696.12542" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.696.12542</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Burke NW, Holwell G (2024) Plastic background colour matching in the springbok mantis. Functional Ecology 38: 449–464. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1365-2435.14482" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14482</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Castillo-Carrillo PS, Purizaga-Preciado JL, Eras-Rosillo JL (2022) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Liturgusa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">maya</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Saussure, Zehntner, 1894 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Liturgusidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), a species of mantis frequent in cocoa crops in the Tumbes region, Peru. Manglar 19: 99–105. <ext-link xlink:href="10.17268/manglar.2022.013" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.17268/manglar.2022.013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>CHELSA Climate (2022) Chelsa Climate. <ext-link xlink:href="https://chelsa-climate.org/" ext-link-type="uri">https://chelsa-climate.org/</ext-link> [Accessed July 7, 2022]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Crane J (1952) A comparative study of innate defensive behavior in Trinidad mantids (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Orthoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, Mantoidea). Zoologica 37: 259–293. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5962/p.203471" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5962/p.203471</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Cuesta F, Peralvo M, Merino-Viteri A, Bustamante M, Baquero F, Freile JF, Torres-Carvajal O (2017) Priority areas for biodiversity conservation in mainland Ecuador. Neotropical Biodiversity 3: 93–106. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/23766808.2017.1295705" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2017.1295705</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>De La Fuente TR (2023) Notas sobre las mantis (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) de Chile: síntesis basada en la literatura y en la plataforma iNaturalist. Revista Chilena de Entomología 49: 5–10. <ext-link xlink:href="10.35249/rche.49.1.23.02" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.49.1.23.02</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Edmunds M (1972) Defensive behaviour in Ghanaian praying mantids. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 51: 1–32. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1096-3642.1972.tb00771.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1972.tb00771.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Falcón JM, Padrón PS (2019) Historia natural de <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pseudopogonogaster</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">hebardi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Terra) (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), una especie de mantis liquen polifénica del sur de Ecuador. Revista Chilena de Entomología 45: 221–235. <ext-link xlink:href="10.35249/rche.45.2.19.6" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.45.2.19.6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Favacho CA, da Silva Carvalho-Filho F (2023) Taxonomic review of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pseudomiopteryx</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Saussure, 1870 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Pseudomiopteryginae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Insect Systematics and Evolution 54: 413–457. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1163/1876312X-bja10047" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-bja10047</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Ferraz BR, Queiroga D, Souza-Diaz PG, Rivera J (2025) Taxonomic revision and natural history of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Metaphotina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Piza, 1964 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Acontistidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Zootaxa 5646: 351–399. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.5646.3.3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5646.3.3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Giannini TC, Chapman DS, Saraiva AM, Alves-dos-Santos I, Biesmeijer JC (2013) Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions: a case study of parasites, pollinators and plants. Ecography 36: 649–656. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07191.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07191.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Godsoe W, Harmon LJ (2012) How do species interactions affect species distribution models? Ecography 35: 811–820. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07103.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07103.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Goldstein I, Ehrenreich IM (2021) Genetic variation in phenotypic plasticity. In: Pfennig DW (Ed.) Phenotypic plasticity and evolution: Causes, consequences, controversies. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, Florida, 91–111. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1201/9780429343001-6" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429343001-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Lanna LM, Rocha JFH, Cavalcante S, Godoy D, Teixeira MLF (2021) First record of non-carnivore feeding behavior in a wild praying mantis (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Mantidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Entomological Communications 3: ec03003. <ext-link xlink:href="10.37486/2675-1305.ec03003" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.37486/2675-1305.ec03003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Lilley C (2022) W3C. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-4/Overview.html#terminology" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-4/Overview.html#terminology</ext-link> [Accessed June 15, 2022]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Liu SZG, Ma R (2025) Differentiation in the body color of <italic>Creobroter gemmata</italic> under red and green background at an early stage. bioRxiv, 2025-03. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1101/2025.03.05.641766" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.05.641766</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Lombardo F, Agabiti B (2001) The mantids from Ecuador, with some biogeographic considerations. Journal of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Orthoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Research 10: 89–104. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1665/1082-6467(2001)010%5B0089:TMFEWS%5D2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467(2001)010[0089:TMFEWS]2.0.CO;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Whittaker RJ (2012) Biogeography. The Quarterly Review of Biology 87: 153–154. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1086/665420" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1086/665420</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Lücking R, Mata-Lorenzen J, Dauphin G (2010) Epizoic liverworts, lichens and fungi growing on Costa Rican Shield <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Mantis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Choeradodis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 45: 175–186. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/01650521.2010.532387" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2010.532387</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Holt RD (2009) Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21<sup>st</sup> century: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 19659–19665. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.0905137106" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905137106</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Mason BM, Mesaglio T, Barratt Heitmann J, Chandler M, Chowdhury S, Gorta SBZ, Callaghan CT (2025) iNaturalist accelerates biodiversity research. BioScience 75: 953–965. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/biosci/biaf104" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf104</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Matsura T, Morooka K (1983) Influences of Prey Density on Fecundity in a <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Mantis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Paratenodera</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">angustipennis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (S.). Oecología 56: 306–312. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/bf00379704" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00379704</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Maxwell MR (1998) Lifetime mating opportunities and male mating behaviour in sexually cannibalistic praying mantids. Animal Behavior Group, Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California at Davis 55: 1011–1028. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1006/anbe.1997.0671" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0671</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador (2012) Sistema de clasificación de los ecosistemas del Ecuador continental. Subsecretaría de Patrimonio Natural, Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Mosandl R, Günter S, Stimm B, Weber M (2008) Ecuador suffers the highest deforestation rate in South America. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (Eds) Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador. Ecological Studies, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 37–40. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-3-540-73526-7_4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73526-7_4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Moulin N, Roy R (2020) Synthèse des connaissances des <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> de Guyane. Naturae 2: 31–53. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5852/naturae2020a2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5852/naturae2020a2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Moulin N, Meurgey F, Hugel S (2021) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> from Eastern Caribbean Islands. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 57: 235–257. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00379271.2021.1932590" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2021.1932590</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>iNaturalist (2024) iNaturalist Research-grade observations. iNaturalist. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.inaturalist.org" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.inaturalist.org</ext-link> [Accessed 12 03 2024]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Nijhout HF (2003) Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evolution &amp; Development 5: 9–18. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03003.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03003.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Noor MAF, Parnell RS, Grant BS (2008) A Reversible Color Polyphenism in American Peppered Moth (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Biston</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">betularia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies">cognataria</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) Caterpillars. PLOS ONE 3: e3142. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0003142" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003142</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GV, Underwood EC, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience 51: 933–938. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051%5B0933:TEOTWA%5D2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling 190: 231–259. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Radosavljevic A, Anderson RP (2014) Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. Journal of Biogeography 41: 629–643. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jbi.12227" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12227</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Rasband WS (1997–2018) ImageJ. U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. <ext-link xlink:href="https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/" ext-link-type="uri">https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/</ext-link> [Accessed July 23, 2022]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Rivas CA, Guerrero-Casado J, Navarro-Cerillo RM (2021) Deforestation and fragmentation trends of seasonal dry tropical forest in Ecuador: impact on conservation. Forest Ecosystems 8: 46. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s40663-021-00329-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00329-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Rivera J (2003) Discovery of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Podagrion</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">brasiliense</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Howard, 1894 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Torymidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) as a parasitoid of the oöthecae of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">surinama</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Saussure, 1869) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Revista Peruana de Entolomogía 43: 20–20.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Rivera J, Yagui H, Ehrmann R (2011) Mantids in the mist – Taxonomy of the Andean genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pseudopogonogaster</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Beier, 1942, a cloud forest specialist, with notes on its biogeography and ecology (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Miopteryginae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Insect Systematics and Evolution 42: 313–335. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1163/187631211X595056" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1163/187631211X595056</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Rivera J, Svenson GJ (2016) The Neotropical ‘polymorphic earless praying mantises’–Part I: molecular phylogeny and revised higher‐level systematics (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Acanthopoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Systematic Entomology 41: 607–649. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/syen.12178" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12178</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Rivera J, Callohuari Y (2020) A new species of praying mantis from Peru Reveals impaling as a novel hunting strategy in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Thespidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Thespini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Neotropical Entomology 49: 234–249. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13744-019-00744-y" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00744-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Rivera J, Svenson GJ (2020) The Neotropical “polymorphic earless praying mantises” – Part I: Molecular phylogeny and revised higher-level systematics (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Acanthopoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Systematic Entomology 41: 607–649. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/syen.12178" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12178</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Rivera J, Vergara-Cobián C (2017) A checklist of the praying mantises of Peru: new records, one new genus (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Piscomantis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> gen. n.) and biogeographic remarks (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Zootaxa 4337: 361–389. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.4337.3.3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4337.3.3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Robinson MH (1969) The defensive behaviour of some orthopteroid insects from Panama. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 121: 281–303. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2311.1969.tb00521.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1969.tb00521.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Ron SR (2020) Regiones naturales del Ecuador. BIOWEB. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. <ext-link xlink:href="https://bioweb.bio/faunaweb/amphibiaweb/RegionesNaturales" ext-link-type="uri">https://bioweb.bio/faunaweb/amphibiaweb/RegionesNaturales</ext-link> [Accessed October 21, 2022]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Saussure HD (1870) Additions au système des Mantides. Mittheilungen der Schweizerischen entomologischen Gesellschaft 3: 221–244.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Scherrer MV, Aguiar AP (2022) Comparative morphology of the post-embryonic development reveals the existence of distinct nymphal semaphoronts for <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superorder">Dictyoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (NS) 58: 469–498. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00379271.2022.2142158" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2022.2142158</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>Schwarz CJ, Ehrmann R, Stiewe MB, Moertter R, Falkenberg M (2020) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> of Panguana (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superorder">Dictyoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Zootaxa 4824: 1–66. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.4824.1.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4824.1.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Schwarz CJ, Roy R (2019) The systematics of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> revisited: an updated classification incorporating multiple data sources (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superorder">Dictyoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.) 55: 101–196. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00379271.2018.1556567" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2018.1556567</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Shcheglovitova M, Anderson RP (2013) Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: a jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling 269: 9–17. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Schwarz CJ, Glaw F (2021) The luring mantid: Protrusible pheromone glands in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Stenophylla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">lobivertex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Acanthopidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Journal of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Orthoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Research 30: 31–33. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/jor.30.55274" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.55274</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Simpson SJ, Sword GA, Lo N (2011) Polyphenism in insects. Current Biology 21: R738–R749. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.006" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <mixed-citation>Trillo MC, Agudelo AA, Guerrero JC, Miguel L, Lorier E (2021) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Mantodea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) of Uruguay: diversity and distribution. Zootaxa 4963: 423–456. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.4963.3.3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4963.3.3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <mixed-citation>Westwood JO (1889) Revisio Insectorum Familiae Mantidarum speciebus novis aut minus cognitis descriptis et delineatis. Gurney and Jackson.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec7">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec8">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec9">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec10">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>Regarding the use of AI in the preparation of this manuscript, the authors declare the following:</p>
        <p>Artificial intelligence tools were used exclusively to improve the clarity, grammar, and overall quality of the written text. AI assistance was applied during the editing and revision stages to refine language, enhance readability, and ensure consistency in academic style across the manuscript. The AI was not used for data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, or generation of scientific content. All scientific ideas, analyses, interpretations, and conclusions presented in this article are entirely the responsibility of the authors.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec11">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>No funding was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec12">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>J.M.G.-C., J.R., and P.S.P.M. contributed equally to the conception and design of the study. All authors participated in fieldwork and data collection, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, and were involved in drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec13">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>J.M. Guillén-Carpio <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4235-3829" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4235-3829</ext-link></p>
        <p>J. Rivera <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8497-3042" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8497-3042</ext-link></p>
        <p>P.S. Padrón Martínez <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9104-1657" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9104-1657</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec14">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jor.35.185742.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">6AA8EE51-AD68-5BC3-B55C-26715BA7BC68</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>pdf</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>Occurrence records used to estimate the potential distribution area of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Musonia">Musonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="margheritae">margheritae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Ecuador. Records include both previously published data and the new occurrences documented in this study.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="jor-35-299-s001.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1742726.pdf">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1742726</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors">Author: Juan Mateo Guillén-Carpio, Julio Rivera, Pablo Sebastián Padrón Martínez</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
